WriteLog
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [WriteLog] Cabrillo file version

To: "'Gary AL9A'" <al9a@mtaonline.net>, "'Writelog Reflector'" <writelog@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [WriteLog] Cabrillo file version
From: "Randy Thompson K5ZD" <k5zd@charter.net>
Reply-to: k5zd@charter.net
Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 00:16:36 -0000
List-post: <writelog@contesting.com">mailto:writelog@contesting.com>
The version of Writelog I am using (11.04) creates Cabrillo files in v3.0
format. I think it has been this way for a long time.

Randy, K5ZD
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: writelog-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:writelog-
> bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Gary AL9A
> Sent: Monday, May 07, 2012 12:07 AM
> To: Writelog Reflector
> Subject: [WriteLog] Cabrillo file version
> 
> Meant to send this last week, but forgot.  I've started noticing recently
> that several contest sponsors are requesting that Cabrillo files be
> created to V3.0 stamdards.  Cabrillo files created with WL are still using
> V2.0 standards in creating the file.  I'm not sure what all the
> differences are, but it seems like it is mostly related to header terms.
> I think the JIDX contest rules required the Cabrillo to be in V3.0 format.
> Their web page showed the report header terminology and the column layout.
> After creating the Cabrillo with WL I had to go in and edit many of the
> header terms and add a missing "0" from column 80 that they required
> before they would accept my Cabrillo file.  Any plans to upgrade the
> Cabrillo output to the latest version soon?
> 
> 73,
> Gary AL9A
> 
> _______________________________________________
> WriteLog mailing list
> WriteLog@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/writelog
> WriteLog on the web:  http://www.writelog.com/

_______________________________________________
WriteLog mailing list
WriteLog@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/writelog
WriteLog on the web:  http://www.writelog.com/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>