Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

[AMPS] Building a Better Amp/RE: 3-500Z/ G

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: [AMPS] Building a Better Amp/RE: 3-500Z/ G
From: k0wa@southwind.net (Lee Buller)
Date: Sun, 30 Mar 1997 17:27:21 -0600 (CST)
Carl...KM1H wrote:
>Look at it this way for a moment, we have three 3-500Z amps with "some
>sort" of a problem; the SB-220, TL-922 and AL-82.  We have others that,
>to my knowledge, have never had problems; L-4 and L-7 ( discount the poor
>PS); Ten-Tec Centurion; various Henry's; PT-2500A (after they redesigned
>the Pi-L !!). Even the LK-500 series is plenty reliable; I've beat the
>hell out of one for 10 years and it still runs fine.  
>
>Why is the 3-500Z so squirrely when the 3CX800, 8877, 8874 and the like
>are not. VHF gain is not the answer since those latter tubes will run
>full bore in the 250-450 MHz range. Why are some 3-500 designs bullet
>proof? Can anyone see a common thread? 
>
>73....Carl  KM1H
>

Carl...  Hallejuah.  Now we are going to get somewhere.  I want to see the 
answer to this thread.  Instead of "bitchen" lets design a 3-500Z/G (take 
your pick) that really works like a champ that noone...not one person...can 
pick apart.  This is going to be fun!

73....Lee k0wa@southwind.net


--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html
Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [AMPS] Building a Better Amp/RE: 3-500Z/ G, Lee Buller <=