| To: | <amps@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Amps] 87A vs. IC-PW1 |
| From: | Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com> |
| Date: | Wed, 22 Feb 2006 20:18:10 -0800 |
| List-post: | <mailto:amps@contesting.com> |
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: At 10:08 AM 2/22/2006, Jim Brown wrote: >To me, QSK is an >absolute MUST for CW operation. Without it, you're a lid ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Pretty bold statement there, Jim. Are you sure you want to call half the CW ops in the world lids? 73, Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Amps] 87A vs. IC-PW1, Bill Turner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Amps] QSK or not, Bill Turner |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Amps] 87A vs. IC-PW1, Jim Brown |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Amps] 87A vs. IC-PW1, Paul Christensen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |