To: | "Keith Dutson" <kdutson@sbcglobal.net>, <amps@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [Amps] 87A vs. IC-PW1 |
From: | Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net> |
Date: | Thu, 23 Feb 2006 19:17:59 -0800 |
List-post: | <mailto:amps@contesting.com> |
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: At 07:06 PM 2/23/2006, Keith Dutson wrote: >To each his own. I happen to like the way mine looks and works, and I like >the fact that I have one of the 20 that were produced. > >http://www.dutson.net/Ham/IMG_0840ds.JPG >http://www.dutson.net/Ham/IMG_0827ds.JPG > >73, Keith NM5G ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Looks good to me too. Any reason why only 20 were produced? 73, Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [Amps] 87A vs. IC-PW1, Keith Dutson |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [Amps] 87A vs. IC-PW1, Keith Dutson |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [Amps] 87A vs. IC-PW1, Keith Dutson |
Next by Thread: | Re: [Amps] 87A vs. IC-PW1, Keith Dutson |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |