| To: | Steve Thompson <g8gsq72@gmail.com>, amps@contesting.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Amps] Duty cycle for processed SSB in contest conditions? |
| From: | peter chadwick <g8on@fsmail.net> |
| Reply-to: | g8on@fsmail.net |
| Date: | Sun, 23 Feb 2014 14:17:31 +0100 |
| List-post: | <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com> |
>Tx/rx duty cycle - we used to hit 80% when calling CQ during the small hours in VHF events.< Sounds like the definition we had of a broadcaster - 'It is better to send than to receive'... 73 Peter G3RZP _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Amps] Duty cycle for processed SSB in contest conditions?, peter chadwick |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Amps] Working on my Darwin award, Fuqua, Bill L |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Amps] Duty cycle for processed SSB in contest conditions?, peter chadwick |
| Next by Thread: | [Amps] HV Fuses, Jim Garland |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |