CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Should contest ops QRS?

To: CQ-Contest Reflector <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Should contest ops QRS?
From: Art Boyars <artboyars@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2026 14:45:53 -0500
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Ah, yes... VP2E.  A 'fone contest. Saturday night.  I was at a certain
Multi-Multi station (who will divulge their identity if they wish).  Things
were a little slow.  VP2E was running on some band.  I wrote up a list for
QTL ("Send me the list of all the op's at your M-M station").  But I did
not include only the op's at the M-M -- I wrote down calls of people I knew
who would not be in the contest, about twenty calls altogether.

The station proprietor and I sat down together to work VP2E, with the
microphone between us, alternating as we ran down the list of calls.  After
eight or ten eight-second QSOs the VP2E op asked "Are they really all
there?"  The proprietor and I started laughing, but kept going.  We got to
laughing so hard that some W7 squeezed in a QSO.  We laughed even harder.

We finished the list, and VP2E went back to their ho-hum 300 QSO/hr.

Within the rules?  Not then, and maybe even less so now.  Legal?  How can
you ask such a question?  Fun?  Absolutely!  Harmless?  Probably (I hope),
otherwise we wouldn't have done it.

Forty-five years later, would I do it again?  Of course not!  Unless I was
looking for a laugh.   :>)

73, Art K3KU

On Tue, Feb 10, 2026 at 2:21 PM Lee Hiers <lee.hiers@gmail.com> wrote:

> VP2E in 1981...phone contest, but still.  We were running a bit north of
> 300 Qs/Hr. and a guy came on and drawled "If you'd talk slower you'd work
> more people".  He said it a couple of times and in the meantime, we worked
> several folks under him.  I'm pretty certain he was being serious and not
> yanking our chain....
>
> 73 de Lee, AA4GA
>
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>