RFI
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RFI] RFI Digest, Vol 73, Issue 22

To: rfi@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RFI] RFI Digest, Vol 73, Issue 22
From: KC7VDA <KC7VDA@keepandbeararms.com>
Reply-to: KC7VDA <KC7VDA@keepandbeararms.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 07:52:47 -0800
List-post: <rfi@contesting.com">mailto:rfi@contesting.com>
Hello all;
A few years ago I  converted to CFL lights, like them very much, HOWEVER!!!!!! 
Every time we have a thunderstorm I have to replace several lights. 
I have only had a few reach there normal end of life. 
My conclusion is that the main problem with CFL's is their lack of ability to 
withstand surges.
I am seriously considering having the power company install a surge regulator 
at the meter.
OK that my 0.02 cents worth to the thread.
Dan KC7VDA
 
-----Original message-----
From: rfi-request@contesting.com
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 10:00:13 -0800
To: rfi@contesting.com
Subject: RFI Digest, Vol 73, Issue 22

> Send RFI mailing list submissions to
>       rfi@contesting.com
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>       http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>       rfi-request@contesting.com
> 
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>       rfi-owner@contesting.com
> 
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of RFI digest..."
> 
> 
> Today's Topics:
> 
>    1. Re: CFLs and LEDs (David C. Hallam)
>    2. Re: CFLs and LEDs (Peter Laws)
>    3. Re: CFLs and LEDs (David C. Hallam)
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Message: 1
> Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 08:17:00 -0500
> From: "David C. Hallam" <dhallam@rapidsys.com>
> Subject: Re: [RFI] CFLs and LEDs
> To: rfi@contesting.com
> Message-ID: <497088CC.8090404@rapidsys.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
> 
> Alan NV8A wrote:
> > On 01/09/09 12:17 pm I wrote:
> > 
> >> Some of our CFLs have not lasted very long, and they do take a little
> >> while to achieve full brightness.
> >>
> >> Yesterday at Sam's Club I picked up a two-pack of 45-watt-equivalent LED
> >> bulbs with a power consumption of 3.5 watts. These are intended for
> >> track lighting and recessed downlights. There is no delay, they seem
> >> brighter (certainly whiter) than the 50-watt incandescents they
> >> replaced, and so far I have detected no RFI.
> > 
> > Today at Costco I saw 45-watt-equivalent PAR38 LED bulbs, but these had 
> > a power consumption of 5 watts and were about double the price of the 
> > ones I described above. Both are "Lights of America" brand. I think I 
> > had fluorescent security lights of that brand many years back, now that 
> > I come to think of it, and I'm not sure that the bulbs lasted as long as 
> > I expected. But my experience with Sylvania bulbs -- whether 
> > incandescent or CFL -- hasn't been entirely satisfactory either.
> > 
> > Alan NV8A
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > RFI mailing list
> > RFI@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
> > 
> > 
> Do far my experience with CFL's has been very poor.  I mark the date in 
> service on each one as I install it.  6 months is the longest one has 
> lasted with a couple a little as 2 weeks.  Overall, I would rate them as 
> more expensive than incandescent bulbs.  Reduced power consumption does 
> not offset the initial price.  I am going to have to replace two more 
> 100W equivalent ones this morning.
> 
> David
> KC2JD
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 2
> Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 09:30:12 -0600
> From: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [RFI] CFLs and LEDs
> To: rfi@contesting.com
> Message-ID:
>       <2538cc000901160730y2053fbaal3fa96171f7abec36@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> 
> On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 07:17, David C. Hallam <dhallam@rapidsys.com> wrote:
> 
> > Do far my experience with CFL's has been very poor.  I mark the date in
> > service on each one as I install it.  6 months is the longest one has
> > lasted with a couple a little as 2 weeks.  Overall, I would rate them as
> 
> I'm shocked at that.  I mark mine, too.  Some globe-type bulbs in the
> kitchen table fixture have started to go (2 of 5 so far) and I was
> extremely disappointed to see that they'd only been in service for a
> year.
> 
> We replaced all incandescents in our Chicagoland house in 2000-2001
> and most of those were still in service when we moved in 2006.
> Notable exceptions were the two lamps in the outdoor fixtures.  We
> also had some problems with CFLs in a seiling fan fixture which I
> attribute to the fact that the bulb sits at about a 45 deg angle
> instead of vertical (come to think of it, we've had the same issue
> with a ceiling fan fixture here, too.
> 
> Except for special-needs fixtures (like the oven and some others),
> I'll never use incandescents again.
> 
> -- 
> Peter Laws | N5UWY | plaws plaws net | Travel by Train!
> 
> No Trillion-dollar blank check for crooks!
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 3
> Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 10:47:15 -0500
> From: "David C. Hallam" <dhallam@rapidsys.com>
> Subject: Re: [RFI] CFLs and LEDs
> To: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
> Cc: rfi@contesting.com
> Message-ID: <4970AC03.3010803@rapidsys.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
> 
> Peter Laws wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 07:17, David C. Hallam <dhallam@rapidsys.com> wrote:
> > 
> >> Do far my experience with CFL's has been very poor.  I mark the date in
> >> service on each one as I install it.  6 months is the longest one has
> >> lasted with a couple a little as 2 weeks.  Overall, I would rate them as
> > 
> > I'm shocked at that.  I mark mine, too.  Some globe-type bulbs in the
> > kitchen table fixture have started to go (2 of 5 so far) and I was
> > extremely disappointed to see that they'd only been in service for a
> > year.
> > 
> > We replaced all incandescents in our Chicagoland house in 2000-2001
> > and most of those were still in service when we moved in 2006.
> > Notable exceptions were the two lamps in the outdoor fixtures.  We
> > also had some problems with CFLs in a seiling fan fixture which I
> > attribute to the fact that the bulb sits at about a 45 deg angle
> > instead of vertical (come to think of it, we've had the same issue
> > with a ceiling fan fixture here, too.
> > 
> > Except for special-needs fixtures (like the oven and some others),
> > I'll never use incandescents again.
> > 
> I don't remember the date when manufacturing of incandescents is 
> supposed to cease but based on my experience so far I may go out and buy 
> a life time supply of incandescents before it happens.  That may not be 
> too many as I am 72.
> 
> David
> KC2JD
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> RFI mailing list
> RFI@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
> 
> 
> End of RFI Digest, Vol 73, Issue 22
> **********************************
_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>