Do you really think we need more gov't to be involved with inspecting
and testing EVERY item that is made so that it does not hurt people,
cause interference and on and on and on. We would never see another
product brought to market.
We don't live in a perfect world and expecting something like this with
a gov't that is 17trillion in the hole is crazy.
If you have an interference problem, it is your problem to do what you
can to identify it, isolate and even attempt to cure it if it is within
your means. It is your problem and most likely is not affecting anyone
else. The FCC is willing to help, you just have to play their game. If
you are not willing to play their game you are not very interested in
solving your issue.
No nanny state for me please.
Mike W0MU
On 3/21/2014 7:53 AM, Dale J. wrote:
I think you all are missing the point.
The idea is to be proactive and stop the junk from ever hitting the shelves in
the first place. True, it's too late for the junk that's already out there, If
you want to go to war with your neighbors, fine, complain and hope for the
best, but your neighbors I don't believe will take kindly to the FCC letter
stating their TV is illegal and interfering with a ham radio operator therefore
must be shut down or risk a $10000 fine.
Dale, k9vuj
_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
|