RFI
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RFI] RF getting into 4-port wirelss router.

To: rfi@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RFI] RF getting into 4-port wirelss router.
From: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Reply-to: jim@audiosystemsgroup.com
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 16:07:18 -0800
List-post: <rfi@contesting.com">mailto:rfi@contesting.com>
On Wed,1/14/2015 12:28 PM, Roger (K8RI) wrote:
It appears from what you have said that there may be Knob and Tube connected to regular wiring. The biggest problem with Knob and Tube is one of polarization.

Probably a much larger issue with RFI is the wide spacing between the conductors. This increases the area of the magnetic loop, and magnetically induced current is proportional to the loop area. In the near field of antenna, the magnetic field is dominant, so magnetic coupling can be a very big deal.

At my Chicago QTH, I fed my 80/40 dipole with some old 75 ohm KW twinlead, but I also tied the two sides of the feedline together to feed it as a top-loaded quasi-vertical on 80 and 160M. This put a current peak in the shack, and the magnetic coupling to the parallel wire RS232 cable for the K2 caused the CW generation from the logging program to lock up with as little as 15W. I replaced that parallel wire serial cable with unshielded CAT5, using one pair for each signally circuit, and with the returns going to the DB9 shell on both ends. This allowed me to run my Titan at full power.

As an experiment, I loaded that antenna to full power all the way up to 10M, with no RFI issues until I got to 15M. At 15M and above, I needed shielded twisted pair. (I never USED that long wire on the higher bands -- I was simply doing this to learn the conditions under which un-shielded cable was good enough. In that shack, the cable from the computer, a Thinkpad, ran within several feet of the antenna.

73, Jim K9YC
_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>