Thank you, Mike. That is what I had thought, but I wasn't sure.
Ken W7EKB
On 6 Feb 2015 at 8:26, Mike Ryan wrote:
> The vendor really has nothing to do with it. If the sign is indeed the
> problem, which is owned by the pharmacy, the pharmacy is liable for it's
> operation and interference. If you talk to the nearest FCC Field Office,
> they can quickly direct you to the rule. The END USER of the product is
> ultimately responsible. If you get the response that I expect you will,
> (especially if you have a contact name from your power company who can
> verify the source) from the Field Office, they will write the letter to the
> pharmacy directing them to remedy the situation or face a fine. I would expect
> the sign to go away rather quickly after this, as these fines are not cheap.
> This sort of thing happened to me when a neighbor had a solar panel array and
> a
> bad dc to ac inverter. The FCC could care less who made it. The letter was
> written to the neighbor threatening the fine as if should have been. The end
> user of the product must clear up the violation. - Mike
_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
|