RFI
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RFI] Yet another balun question

To: rfi@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RFI] Yet another balun question
From: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Reply-to: jim@audiosystemsgroup.com
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2016 10:02:39 -0700
List-post: <rfi@contesting.com">mailto:rfi@contesting.com>
I just downloaded and skimmed Andrew's QEX paper from docfoc.com (google found it).

Several things jump out at me. First, there is NO attention paid to the ferrite material -- it appears to be assumed as ideal, with no loss. Second, the fundamental property that makes a ferrite common mode choke work is the LOSS coupled from the core and its resonance. This is also ignored. Third, the core used in his experimental work was a Fair-Rite #61 material. This is is rather high-Q material, so its resonance is both narrow and difficult to measure. It is a VERY poor material for a common mode choke in the HF range, for reasons noted in my tutorial.

Bottom line -- the analysis is far to simple, and thus is flawed.

73, Jim K9YC

On Wed,6/29/2016 9:09 AM, JW via RFI wrote:
re: ZS1AN's cascade
Are we talking ferrite loaded TLTs (transmission line transformer) or flux coupled 
transformers and ferrite loaded "chokes" in his design?
I can never keep this current-voltage balun stuff straight.
de Jim WB5WPA


_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>