RFI
[Top] [All Lists]

[RFI] Politics and RFI

To: rfi@contesting.com
Subject: [RFI] Politics and RFI
From: WHYTE <radiotrade@rogers.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2018 14:17:17 -0400
List-post: <mailto:rfi@contesting.com>
A few comments, especially for Ontario hams on this List.

Re- contacting the AM broadcasters about RFI to their signal- they are well 
aware of the problem. They know the increased noise floor and loss of listeners 
-due to RFI - is a growing problem. In a recent submission for a new FM BC Band 
licence, a Toronto AM powerhouse sighted increased digital noise from rampant 
household digital devices- (with SMPS the usual culprit) . Their solution to 
this problem? Not asking for better enforcement or better regulations, but to 
basically abandon AM and transition to FM. Some also try to request higher AM 
power to combat higher  noise levels at the listeners QTH- but none have 
bothered mounting any kind of campaign to protect the AM BC allocation. Where 
is the broadcasters association in all this? They don’t seem to care either.

I think the sell off of the spectrum for a new digital service is unavoidable - 
and they know it, so why waste the money trying to keep AM BC radio RFI free.

“Liberal” Ontario is also going to convert our regional Diesel  “GO train” 
system to electric.  (Global warming you know) I believe they will also use an 
overhead wire system, (seen in an early drawing)  but I’ve not recently confirm 
. If so, this will be a real RFI problem for the RF spectrum , as others have 
witnessed.   

The country-wide legalization of Pot and allowance of “home growing ops” will 
also have residential grow-lights adding to the S-9 buzz, hash and noise. 

The lack of any prevention or abatement plan by Canadian RF stakeholders is 
puzzling and astounding.
Greg
VE3FAX


_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>