RFI
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RFI] RFI Digest, Vol 218, Issue 27

To: rfi@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RFI] RFI Digest, Vol 218, Issue 27
From: Kenneth Wyatt via RFI <rfi@contesting.com>
Reply-to: Kenneth Wyatt <wyattphoto@mac.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2021 13:16:16 -0600
List-post: <mailto:rfi@contesting.com>
Tom,

The usual loop antenna design picks up magnetic fields, which tend to be 
dominant from SMPS transformers and inductors.

Cheers, Ken
________________
Ken Wyatt
wyattphoto@mac.com





> On Mar 23, 2021, at 1:11 PM, rfi-request@contesting.com wrote:
> 
> Send RFI mailing list submissions to
>       rfi@contesting.com
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>       http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>       rfi-request@contesting.com
> 
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>       rfi-owner@contesting.com
> 
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of RFI digest..."
> 
> 
> Today's Topics:
> 
>   1. Re: New Interference at kk0sd (Tom Thompson)
>   2. Re: New Interference at kk0sd (Don Kirk)
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Message: 1
> Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2021 12:27:45 -0600
> From: Tom Thompson <w0ivj@tomthompson.com>
> To: Mike Martin <mike@rfiservices.com>, Gary
>       <gary_mayfield@hotmail.com>
> Cc: Rfi List <rfi@contesting.com>
> Subject: Re: [RFI] New Interference at kk0sd
> Message-ID: <fff7cac5-fe47-3b8a-20f1-349436e51149@tomthompson.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
> 
> See:? http://tomthompson.com/radio/ReceivingLoop/loop.html? for a tuned 
> loop.? You can build one in a couple of hours from your junk box.? This 
> type of loop does not work well for power line noise ( a vhf yagi is 
> better for that), but it does work well for switch mode RFI.? Since most 
> of these noise sources are vertically? polarized, look through the loop 
> for the null and along the edge for the peak. When close to the source, 
> the polarization may switch.
> 
> 73,?? Tom?? W0IVJ
> 
> On 3/23/2021 6:32 AM, Mike Martin wrote:
>> Remember in his shack he has a very good radio and a very good antenna which 
>> together increased sensitivity and allow him to hear much further away. when 
>> he goes outside with a portable and a smaller antenna he doesn't have the 
>> sensitivity he had inside there for he may have to travel a lot further 
>> before he's able to receive it.
>> 
>> ?Be safe,
>> Mike
>> 
>> Get BlueMail for Android ?
>> 
>> On Mar 22, 2021, 11:37 PM, at 11:37 PM, Gary <gary_mayfield@hotmail.com> 
>> wrote:
>>> Kim,
>>> 
>>>     I hear it on the portable when connected to the vertical antenna, but
>>> will undertake an antenna substitution experiment this weekend.
>>> 
>>> Keep the suggestions coming!
>>> 
>>> 73 and Thanks,
>>> Gary "Joe", kk0sd
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: RFI <rfi-bounces+gary_mayfield=hotmail.com@contesting.com> On
>>> Behalf Of Kim Elmore
>>> Sent: Monday, March 22, 2021 4:44 PM
>>> To: Don Kirk <wd8dsb@gmail.com>
>>> Cc: Rfi List <rfi@contesting.com>
>>> Subject: Re: [RFI] New Interference at kk0sd
>>> 
>>> That?s a great idea, too! I once ran into an interference problem that
>>> was inherent to the antenna, but only under certain conditions. It
>>> didn?t sound like Gary?s but I pulled a lot of hair out fixing that
>>> one. I?m simply suspicious that he hears NOTHING with his portable rx
>>> so I?m after eliminating anything inherent to his station. Standing by
>>> his vertical with his portable rx is a great idea.
>>> 
>>> 73,
>>> 
>>> Kim N5OP
>>> 
>>> "People that make music together cannot be enemies, at least as long as
>>> the music lasts." -- Paul Hindemith
>>> 
>>>> On Mar 22, 2021, at 2:24 PM, Don Kirk <wd8dsb@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> ?
>>>> Hi Dave,
>>>> 
>>>> I still recommend tuned and untuned loops to folks on an almost daily
>>> basis but they definitely don?t shed as much light on the situation as
>>> a unidirectional antenna does.  It would be nice to see what your
>>> shielded untuned loop design is.
>>>> The beauty of the portable flag which is unidirectional is that you
>>> typically can walk right to the source (no guessing which direction the
>>> signal is coming from).  I still pack 7 antennas when I go on a RFI
>>> case, and this includes 3 tuned HF loops, but I have found that I
>>> typically don?t use bidirectional loops anymore (unless I?m trying to
>>> be more stealth) as the portable flag saves me an enormous amount of
>>> time.  Also in heavily congested areas (like downtown Indianapolis)
>>> having the unidirectional HF antenna is priceless as it unmasks noise
>>> that?s mixing from other sources that are in the opposite direction,
>>> etc.  Yesterday I worked on a case (more of a country setting) where I
>>> had 2 different bad poles that were only 0.14 miles apart plus a 3rd
>>> RFI source generating spikes every 1 KHz within the same area and
>>> having the unidirectional HF antenna helped me locate all 3 sources in
>>> a matter of minutes (way under an hour).
>>>> You can never have enough antennas in your direction finding bag of
>>> tricks but after using a unidirectional HF antenna like the portable
>>> flag for direction finding I can?t imagine not using one.  It typically
>>> takes me seconds to tell which direction the signal is without the need
>>> of triangulation, etc.  Traditional triangulation has almost become a
>>> thing of the past for me.
>>>> I also have been helping a ham that has the MFJ unit (the one with a
>>> beam and the one with a dipole) and while it has helped him, it has an
>>> odd characteristic that makes the meter jump which causes confusion to
>>> him and after looking at the schematic I question how they implemented
>>> AGC in those units.  I?m starting to think AGC in a radio direction
>>> finding system is typically not desirable.  Manual attenuation is
>>> priceless but I don?t want anything changing gain automatically.
>>>> Just my opinion from tracking down RFI on an almost continuous basis
>>> in addition to my day job.
>>>> Please share details on your shielded untuned loop and thanks.
>>>> 
>>>> 73,
>>>> Don wd8dsb
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 1:22 PM David Eckhardt
>>> <davearea51a@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> We recently found a faulty lightning 'arrestor' on a pole by using
>>>>> both the MFJ device and a small shielded loop (easy home brew
>>>>> project) into a battery-powered receiver.  We had two of us in the
>>>>> field.  One wielded the MFJ and I had the small (0.5-meter) shielded
>>>>> loop fed into the Yaesu VR-500 on 1.830 MHz (160-meters).  We both
>>>>> independently found the same source / pole in the field.  The null
>>> on
>>>>> the shielded loop is extremely sharp and this piece of hardware
>>>>> should be in the bag of tricks of anyone sleuthing RFI.  It is a
>>>>> powerful tool when coupled to a battery-powered receiver with its
>>>>> extremely sharp null (perpendicular to the plane of the loop).  One
>>> doesn't need something as large as the 'Flag" that was recently
>>> published
>>>>> in QST and referred to in a previous post in this thread.   Another
>>> plus
>>>>> for the shielded loop is that in the field, one can tune the
>>> receiver
>>>>> to the worst-case frequency of the RFI as I did in the related
>>> story, above.
>>>>> The shielded loop is untuned.  The MFJ relies only on VHF noise.
>>> In some
>>>>> cases, an ultrasonic microphone at the focus of a small parabolic or
>>>>> spherical reflector is good at finding coronal discharges as well as
>>>>> active arcs and discharges.  MFJ also makes that at a reasonable
>>> price.
>>>>> Our power provider was out the next day to fix the problem.  We even
>>>>> gave them the pole number which is a great help to any power
>>> provider.
>>>>> Dave - W?LEV
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 2:28 AM Kim Elmore
>>> <cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>>>>>> It's odd that you can't hear it on your portable rx. That made me
>>>>>> curious: What if this is something internal to your '847? Have you
>>>>>> tried pulling your '847 and listening on a different receiver
>>> using
>>>>>> the same antenna? If you have, do you still hear the noise? It's a
>>> long shot, but...
>>>>>> Kim N5OP
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 3/21/2021 7:28 PM, Gary wrote:
>>>>>>> Mike,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>                  Thanks for the info. I understand locating the
>>>>>>> noise is
>>>>>> more important than identifying the noise. I am just try to play
>>>>>> all the angles as I was hoping to work the WPX contest nest
>>>>>> weekend. I have been walking the neighborhood a good chunk of the
>>>>>> afternoon, and have not been able to hear the noise on my portable
>>>>>> shortwave and loop antenna. It is as strong as ever on my home
>>> station.
>>>>>>>                  I have an MFJ 852 Noise Finder and it seems to
>>>>>>> go crazy
>>>>>> when broadside to any house. The neighbors on each side of me
>>> drive
>>>>>> the meter full scale.
>>>>>>>                  Yep I only want to knock on one door, as I know
>>>>>>> that
>>>>>> can get dicey. I would rather place a call to a utility, but can?t
>>>>>> really do either until I know.
>>>>>>>                  Keep the suggestions coming!
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Thanks and 73,
>>>>>>> Gary ?Joe? kk0sd
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> From: Mike Martin <mike@rfiservices.com>
>>>>>>> Sent: Sunday, March 21, 2021 6:53 PM
>>>>>>> To: Gary <gary_mayfield@hotmail.com>
>>>>>>> Cc: rfi@contesting.com
>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [RFI] New Interference at kk0sd
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Joe I haven't had time to read all the other input but I can
>>> tell
>>>>>>> you it
>>>>>> is not an arcing source or a sparking source. either one of the
>>> two
>>>>>> would be much broader than what you're reporting. if someone were
>>>>>> to tell you exactly what it is you really wouldn't be any further
>>>>>> ahead. You would still have to find which residents or business
>>>>>> it's in. My suggestion would be to either go mobile or on foot,
>>>>>> preferably on foot listening to the frequency that you know the
>>>>>> problem affects. once you locate the residents then go through the
>>>>>> breaker scenario and locate what the source is. Be 100% certain of
>>>>>> the structure or home that the problem is in before knocking on
>>> the
>>>>>> door. The last thing you want to do is start guessing. Guessing
>>> we'll ruin the relationship with your neighbors.
>>>>>>> Be safe,
>>>>>>> Mike k3RFI
>>>>>>> www.rfiservices.com<http://www.rfiservices.com>
>>>>>>> Get BlueMail for Android<http://www.bluemail.me/r?b=16696>
>>>>>>> On Mar 21, 2021, at 2:01 PM, Gary
>>> <gary_mayfield@hotmail.com<mailto:
>>>>>> gary_mayfield@hotmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>> My last problem was tracked down to a neon sign in a neighbors
>>>>>>> garage. I
>>>>>> had several months of blissful relatively low noise operation, but
>>>>>> now have a new RFI issue.
>>>>>>> You can see a recording of it here:
>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GKf4P44FXMo
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I have turned all of the breakers in my home off and run the
>>>>>>> radio from
>>>>>> a battery and the noise remains.
>>>>>>> My neighborhood utilities are all underground.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> There are no solar installations in my neighborhood, and the
>>>>>>> noise is
>>>>>> there at night anyway...
>>>>>>> The noise is not detectable on the AM broadcast band, but starts
>>>>>>> around
>>>>>> 2 MHz and runs to at least 6 meters.
>>>>>>> It is there 7 days a week 24 hours a day.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> It is not detectable from my pickup when I drive the streets of
>>>>>>> my
>>>>>> neighborhood (checking both AM broadcast and Shortwave).
>>>>>>> If any one has heard something like this, I would love to hear
>>>>>>> what you
>>>>>> found.
>>>>>>> Thank You for your input and help!
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 73,
>>>>>>> Gary "Joe",  kk0sd
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> ________________________________
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> RFI mailing list
>>>>>>> RFI@contesting.com<mailto:RFI@contesting.com>
>>>>>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> RFI mailing list
>>>>>>> RFI@contesting.com
>>>>>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Kim Elmore, Ph.D. (Adj. Assoc. Prof., OU School of Meteorology,
>>>>>> CCM, PP SEL/MEL/Glider, N5OP, 2nd Class Radiotelegraph, GROL)
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> /"A great second violinist plays second fiddle to no one." //?
>>> Robert C.
>>>>>> Marsh, Chicago Sun-Times./
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> RFI mailing list
>>>>>> RFI@contesting.com
>>>>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> --
>>>>> *Dave - W?LEV*
>>>>> *Just Let Darwin Work*
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> RFI mailing list
>>>>> RFI@contesting.com
>>>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> RFI mailing list
>>> RFI@contesting.com
>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> RFI mailing list
>>> RFI@contesting.com
>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
>> _______________________________________________
>> RFI mailing list
>> RFI@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 2
> Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2021 15:11:11 -0400
> From: Don Kirk <wd8dsb@gmail.com>
> To: Mike Martin <mike@rfiservices.com>
> Cc: Gary <gary_mayfield@hotmail.com>, Kim Elmore
>       <cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net>,     Rfi List <rfi@contesting.com>
> Subject: Re: [RFI] New Interference at kk0sd
> Message-ID:
>       <CAKtW65d94DMhbd3RW8eP9Q8XaiK9Y5Yr-HOiyz6rD5vqar3vhw@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
> 
> Hi Mike, Gary, and gang,
> 
> Well after seeing Garys shielded un-tuned loop, I watched the video on how
> to build that loop.  I just built one almost identical to his loop but used
> RG-58 coax since that's what I had on hand.  I also spent 10 seconds
> building a simple 1 turn 9 inch loop (no form, just free standing) for
> comparisons which is even smaller than Garys loop, and I can tell you there
> is no comparison.  Without doing any impedance matching, the 9 inch
> un-tuned single turn loop I built has a gain that is approximately 23 dB
> greater than Garys loop when tested in the AM broadcast band and it still
> exhibits nice nulls which comes as no surprise.  My single turn non
> shielded loop just has about 6 inches of twisted wire (the same wire that
> forms the loop) to form the feedline to it, and then I just used a 3 foot
> piece of 50 ohm coax to connect it to my receiver.  I used the same 3 foot
> piece of coax to connect the shielded un-tuned loop to the receiver.  While
> my un-tuned 9 inch loop might not be as well balanced (one null might be
> deeper than the opposite null), it makes one fine DF antenna in a pinch.
> Also if Gary needs more gain he can just make the loop I made bigger in
> diameter.  It really just takes seconds to make this antenna (much less
> than a minute).
> 
> I now fully understand why Gary can't hear his noise, as his un-tuned
> shielded loop has very poor sensitivity based on my trying to copy the
> design.  While I normally use preamps with my DF loops, Garys RFI is so
> strong that I'm pretty darn sure he can make a simple one turn loop to
> figure out what possible directions the signal is coming from.  Something I
> have done in the past is to use a cardboard box as the antenna form as it
> does not have to be round.  Need to figure out what directions the signal
> is coming from before leaving his property if at all possible.
> 
> Just my opinion, and I will try and post some comparison videos but they
> will not be pretty as I'm buried in other tasks.
> 
> 73,
> Don (wd8dsb)
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 8:33 AM Mike Martin <mike@rfiservices.com> wrote:
> 
>> Remember in his shack he has a very good radio and a very good antenna
>> which together increased sensitivity and allow him to hear much further
>> away. when he goes outside with a portable and a smaller antenna he doesn't
>> have the sensitivity he had inside there for he may have to travel a lot
>> further before he's able to receive it.
>> 
>> Be safe,
>> Mike
>> 
>> Get BlueMail for Android <http://www.bluemail.me/r?b=16696>
>> On Mar 22, 2021, at 11:37 PM, Gary <gary_mayfield@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Kim,
>>> 
>>> I hear it on the portable when connected to the vertical antenna, but will 
>>> undertake an antenna substitution experiment this weekend.
>>> 
>>> Keep the suggestions coming!
>>> 
>>> 73 and Thanks,
>>> Gary "Joe", kk0sd
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: RFI <rfi-bounces+gary_mayfield=hotmail.com@contesting.com> On Behalf 
>>> Of Kim Elmore
>>> Sent: Monday, March 22, 2021 4:44 PM
>>> To: Don Kirk <wd8dsb@gmail.com>
>>> Cc: Rfi List <rfi@contesting.com>
>>> Subject: Re: [RFI] New Interference at kk0sd
>>> 
>>> That?s a great idea, too! I once ran into an interference problem that was 
>>> inherent to the antenna, but only under certain conditions. It didn?t sound 
>>> like Gary?s but I pulled a lot of hair out fixing that one. I?m simply 
>>> suspicious that he hears NOTHING with his portable rx so I?m after 
>>> eliminating anything inherent to his station. Standing by his vertical with 
>>> his portable rx is a great idea.
>>> 
>>> 73,
>>> 
>>> Kim N5OP
>>> 
>>> "People that make music together cannot be enemies, at least as long as the 
>>> music lasts." -- Paul Hindemith
>>> 
>>> On Mar 22, 2021, at 2:24 PM, Don Kirk <wd8dsb@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> ?
>>>> Hi Dave,
>>>> 
>>>> I still recommend tuned and untuned loops to folks on an almost daily 
>>>> basis but they definitely don?t shed as much light on the situation as a 
>>>> unidirectional antenna does.  It would be nice to see what your shielded 
>>>> untuned loop design is.
>>>> 
>>>> The beauty of the portable flag which is unidirectional is that you 
>>>> typically can walk right to the source (no guessing which direction the 
>>>> signal is coming from).  I still pack 7 antennas when I go on a RFI case, 
>>>> and this includes 3 tuned HF loops, but I have found that I typically 
>>>> don?t use bidirectional loops anymore (unless I?m trying to be more 
>>>> stealth) as the portable flag saves me an enormous amount of time.  Also 
>>>> in heavily congested areas (like downtown Indianapolis) having the 
>>>> unidirectional HF antenna is priceless as it unmasks noise that?s mixing 
>>>> from other sources that are in the opposite direction, etc.  Yesterday I 
>>>> worked on a case (more of a country setting) where I had 2 different bad 
>>>> poles that were only 0.14 miles apart plus a 3rd RFI source generating 
>>>> spikes every 1 KHz within the same area and having the unidirectional HF 
>>>> antenna helped me locate all 3 sources in a matter of minutes (way under 
>>>> an hour).
>>>> 
>>>> You can never have enough antennas in your direction finding bag of tricks 
>>>> but after using a unidirectional HF antenna like the portable flag for 
>>>> direction finding I can?t imagine not using one.  It typically takes me 
>>>> seconds to tell which direction the signal is without the need of 
>>>> triangulation, etc.  Traditional triangulation has almost become a thing 
>>>> of the past for me.
>>>> 
>>>> I also have been helping a ham that has the MFJ unit (the one with a beam 
>>>> and the one with a dipole) and while it has helped him, it has an odd 
>>>> characteristic that makes the meter jump which causes confusion to him and 
>>>> after looking at the schematic I question how they implemented AGC in 
>>>> those units.  I?m starting to think AGC in a radio direction finding 
>>>> system is typically not desirable.  Manual attenuation is priceless but I 
>>>> don?t want anything changing gain automatically.
>>>> 
>>>> Just my opinion from tracking down RFI on an almost continuous basis in 
>>>> addition to my day job.
>>>> 
>>>> Please share details on your shielded untuned loop and thanks.
>>>> 
>>>> 73,
>>>> Don wd8dsb
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 1:22 PM David Eckhardt <davearea51a@gmail.com> 
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> We recently found a faulty lightning 'arrestor' on a pole by using
>>>>> both the MFJ device and a small shielded loop (easy home brew
>>>>> project) into a battery-powered receiver.  We had two of us in the
>>>>> field.  One wielded the MFJ and I had the small (0.5-meter) shielded
>>>>> loop fed into the Yaesu VR-500 on 1.830 MHz (160-meters).  We both
>>>>> independently found the same source / pole in the field.  The null on
>>>>> the shielded loop is extremely sharp and this piece of hardware
>>>>> should be in the bag of tricks of anyone sleuthing RFI.  It is a
>>>>> powerful tool when coupled to a battery-powered receiver with its
>>>>> extremely sharp null (perpendicular to the plane of the loop).  One 
>>>>> doesn't need something as large as the 'Flag" that was recently published
>>>>> in QST and referred to in a previous post in this thread.   Another plus
>>>>> for the shielded loop is that in the field, one can tune the receiver
>>>>> to the worst-case frequency of the RFI as I did in the related story, 
>>>>> above.
>>>>> The shielded loop is untuned.  The MFJ relies only on VHF noise.   In some
>>>>> cases, an ultrasonic microphone at the focus of a small parabolic or
>>>>> spherical reflector is good at finding coronal discharges as well as
>>>>> active arcs and discharges.  MFJ also makes that at a reasonable price.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Our power provider was out the next day to fix the problem.  We even
>>>>> gave them the pole number which is a great help to any power provider.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Dave - W?LEV
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 2:28 AM Kim Elmore <cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net> 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> It's odd that you can't hear it on your portable rx. That made me
>>>>>> curious: What if this is something internal to your '847? Have you
>>>>>> tried pulling your '847 and listening on a different receiver using
>>>>>> the same antenna? If you have, do you still hear the noise? It's a long 
>>>>>> shot, but...
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Kim N5OP
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 3/21/2021 7:28 PM, Gary wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Mike,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>                  Thanks for the info. I understand locating the
>>>>>>> noise is
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> more important than identifying the noise. I am just try to play
>>>>>> all the angles as I was hoping to work the WPX contest nest
>>>>>> weekend. I have been walking the neighborhood a good chunk of the
>>>>>> afternoon, and have not been able to hear the noise on my portable
>>>>>> shortwave and loop antenna. It is as strong as ever on my home station.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>                  I have an MFJ 852 Noise Finder and it seems to
>>>>>>> go crazy
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> when broadside to any house. The neighbors on each side of me drive
>>>>>> the meter full scale.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>                  Yep I only want to knock on one door, as I know
>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> can get dicey. I would rather place a call to a utility, but can?t
>>>>>> really do either until I know.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>                  Keep the suggestions coming!
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Thanks and 73,
>>>>>>> Gary ?Joe? kk0sd
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> From: Mike Martin <mike@rfiservices.com>
>>>>>>> Sent: Sunday, March 21, 2021 6:53 PM
>>>>>>> To: Gary <gary_mayfield@hotmail.com>
>>>>>>> Cc: rfi@contesting.com
>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [RFI] New Interference at kk0sd
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Joe I haven't had time to read all the other input but I can tell
>>>>>>> you it
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> is not an arcing source or a sparking source. either one of the two
>>>>>> would be much broader than what you're reporting. if someone were
>>>>>> to tell you exactly what it is you really wouldn't be any further
>>>>>> ahead. You would still have to find which residents or business
>>>>>> it's in. My suggestion would be to either go mobile or on foot,
>>>>>> preferably on foot listening to the frequency that you know the
>>>>>> problem affects. once you locate the residents then go through the
>>>>>> breaker scenario and locate what the source is. Be 100% certain of
>>>>>> the structure or home that the problem is in before knocking on the
>>>>>> door. The last thing you want to do is start guessing. Guessing we'll 
>>>>>> ruin the relationship with your neighbors.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Be safe,
>>>>>>> Mike k3RFI
>>>>>>> www.rfiservices.com<http://www.rfiservices.com>
>>>>>>> Get BlueMail for Android<http://www.bluemail.me/r?b=16696>
>>>>>>> On Mar 21, 2021, at 2:01 PM, Gary <gary_mayfield@hotmail.com<mailto:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> gary_mayfield@hotmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> My last problem was tracked down to a neon sign in a neighbors
>>>>>>> garage. I
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> had several months of blissful relatively low noise operation, but
>>>>>> now have a new RFI issue.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> You can see a recording of it here:
>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GKf4P44FXMo
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I have turned all of the breakers in my home off and run the
>>>>>>> radio from
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> a battery and the noise remains.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> My neighborhood utilities are all underground.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> There are no solar installations in my neighborhood, and the
>>>>>>> noise is
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> there at night anyway...
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> The noise is not detectable on the AM broadcast band, but starts
>>>>>>> around
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 2 MHz and runs to at least 6 meters.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> It is there 7 days a week 24 hours a day.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> It is not detectable from my pickup when I drive the streets of
>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> neighborhood (checking both AM broadcast and Shortwave).
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> If any one has heard something like this, I would love to hear
>>>>>>> what you
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> found.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Thank You for your input and help!
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 73,
>>>>>>> Gary "Joe",  kk0sd
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> RFI mailing list
>>>>>>> RFI@contesting.com<mailto:RFI@contesting.com>
>>>>>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
>>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> RFI mailing list
>>>>>>> RFI@contesting.com
>>>>>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Kim Elmore, Ph.D. (Adj. Assoc. Prof., OU School of Meteorology,
>>>>>> CCM, PP SEL/MEL/Glider, N5OP, 2nd Class Radiotelegraph, GROL)
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> /"A great second violinist plays second fiddle to no one." //? Robert C.
>>>>>> Marsh, Chicago Sun-Times./
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> RFI mailing list
>>>>>> RFI@contesting.com
>>>>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> --
>>>>> *Dave - W?LEV*
>>>>> *Just Let Darwin Work*
>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>> 
>>>>> RFI mailing list
>>>>> RFI@contesting.com
>>>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
>>>>> 
>>>> ------------------------------
>>> 
>>> RFI mailing list
>>> RFI@contesting.com
>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
>>> ------------------------------
>>> 
>>> RFI mailing list
>>> RFI@contesting.com
>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
>>> 
>>> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Subject: Digest Footer
> 
> _______________________________________________
> RFI mailing list
> RFI@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> End of RFI Digest, Vol 218, Issue 27
> ************************************

_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>