It would be nice if the RUN station reply with the
TU or QSL at the beginning of his confirmation, this way the S&P
station could move faster... not waiting for the new way
to reply giving the callsign twice...
73,
Claude Du Berger VE2FK
ve2fk@arrl.net
http://www.contestgroupduquebec.com/
----- Original Message -----
From: Bill, W6WRT
To: RTTY
Sent: Monday, September 29, 2008 11:11 AM
Subject: Re: [RTTY] CQWW exchange
I didn't notice this at all. To me, the confirmation is either QSL or
TU, and I wait for one or the other on every QSO. During the recent
contest I don't believe I had a single QSO without receiving one or
the other. Are you (Roger) looking for something more than that?
And I agree totally about the 599. Complete waste of time on RTTY. In
a CW or phone contest it does have some value because it sets the
rhythm and tone for the report which follows, but RTTY has no such
need. I think it's just a carryover from other contests.
73, Bill W6WRT
------------ ORIGINAL MESSAGE ------------
On Mon, 29 Sep 2008 09:55:47 +0000 (GMT), Roger Cooke
<g3ldi@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>, it really was amazing how many stations did not stay around for
confirmation
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|