RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: [RTTY] CQWW exchange

from [Simon \(HB9DRV\)] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: "Kok Chen" <chen@mac.com>, "RTTY Reflector" <rtty@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] CQWW exchange
From: "Simon \(HB9DRV\)" <simon@hb9drv.ch>
Reply-to: "Simon \(HB9DRV\)" <simon@hb9drv.ch>
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2008 20:28:58 +0200
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com> 
One solution is to add a checksum - some combination of callsign and number.

And / or the other station sends the number back in reverse or something or 
other. Anything we can do a computer can do better (if the programmer could 
be bothered).

Simon Brown, HB9DRV
www.ham-radio-deluxe.com

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Kok Chen" <chen@mac.com>
>
> But why couldn't an automated station be able to copy that QSO number
> and then echo it back?  If a human can spot a text string to click on,
> a robot can probably be programmed to do the same, no?
>

_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: [RTTY] CQWW exchange, Kok Chen
Next by Date:  [RTTY] Fw: DNIEPER CUP'2008, Vladimir
Previous by Thread:  Re: [RTTY] CQWW exchange, Kok Chen
Next by Thread:  Re: [RTTY] CQWW exchange, Bill, W6WRT
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]