| To: | topband@contesting.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Topband: Shortened Dipole on 160? |
| From: | jlopez@plasticosomega.com |
| Date: | Sat, 13 Nov 2004 17:34:52 -0500 |
| List-post: | <mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
|
Due my restricted are particular confoguration, I had forgotten abt EWE`s,
Loops, etc... I am wondering if someone in this list had succesfully used a "shortened" 160 mts dipole to be located as Rx antenna pretty close to the floor "low". If do so, I will appreciatte comments with dipole measurements addressed directly to me at yv5mbx@arrl.net to avoid overload the list with maybe information handled by most of you. Thanks for your cooperation!!! 73's de Javier PD: Next week I will be testing an snake Rx antenna, so still looking to improve my Rx based upon my environment restrictions. _______________________________________________ Topband mailing list Topband@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Topband: Receivers, w9ge |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Topband: Receivers, N5ue |
| Previous by Thread: | Topband: When Will It End...?!, Ed Swynar |
| Next by Thread: | Topband: 160 meter noise problem, Dennis Peterson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |