Why use SDRs when there are Beverages, Pennants, K9AY loops? does one
feel satisfied knowing he/she worked a rare DX station using someone
else's RX antennas? if you are really into DXing you will feel bad
about it.
T32C heard 3 times now using single 170m long beverage towards W6
(recording available for anyone who wants to know how it sounds in
Northern CT).
If you hear it, you work it, simple as this.
Filipe CT1ILT aka CR6K
Citando Kostas Stamatis <sv1dpi@otenet.gr>:
> Anyone who makes available his sdr without delay, just helps cheaters. We
> all know some of them who use a sdr receiver to make qsos. Maybe there is no
> need anymore to learn the calls. Just stop this. A delay of 1min for example
> is perfect to enjoy all the goods of an sdr receiver without helping
> cheaters. I don't know if software allows it but i don't think it is
> difficult.
> 73 Kostas sv1dpi
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Thorvaldur Stefansson" <otradalur@gmail.com>
> To: "Brendan Minish" <ei6iz.brendan@gmail.com>; <topband@contesting.com>
> Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2011 7:47 PM
> Subject: Re: Topband: Web SDR's and 'Cheating'
>
>
>> hello Brendan,
>>
>> Perhaps this thread is too old, but I only now came across it, sorry if
>> the
>> subject has been beaten to death already.
>>
>> As you may know I have served my Perseus SDR receiver over the internet
>> for
>> almost a year - it never occurred to me that people would use it for
>> cheating purposes. I found the experiment interesting for a variety of
>> technical issues - it also pleased me to allow remote users to experience
>> what Zero Noise level sounds like. Obviously the issues are the same
>> whether a SDR or a regular remote receiver is used for cheating.
>>
>> http://microtelecom.it/map/PerseusServers.html shows a map of remote
>> Perseus receivers.
>>
>> However, reading your post on the topband reflector got me thinking that
>> the
>> scenario was familiar....:
>>
>> I am hearing a station in the Caribbean on 160m with strong signals and I
>> start calling him thinking he will be an easy QSO.... I call him
>> constantly
>> for about two hours without luck.
>>
>> In the beginning I do not have any propagation to EU, but he is working EU
>> with a fairly good rate.
>>
>> When his signals have almost disappeared (RST 339) at my location and
>> propagation has changed from TF to EU away from the Caribbean (!), he
>> finally hears me and we had a QSO.
>>
>> This is cheating on so many levels I don?t know where to begin...
>>
>> the DX station is listening to a receiver located in EU - and because the
>> DX
>> has a good transmit antenna on an island surrounded by Salt Water he has a
>> relatively good signal in EU - but the DX suffers from high tropical
>> noise
>> making it difficult for him to hear the weaker signals.
>>
>> With the remote receiver, he can now clearly hear even the poorest signal
>> from EU - stations with poor antennas are now able to "work" the DX
>> station
>> even though their setups should not be able to work any DX contacts at
>> all -
>> on the cluster the DX is spotted "good ears" "hears well" "worked with 5
>> watts and window antenna" and so on....
>>
>> At the same time, one of the most powerful stations on the planet is
>> unable
>> to get through since I did not have propagation to EU!
>>
>>
>> All the effort of building a superb station, trying to make use of elusive
>> short propagation openings, all of this is flushed down the toilet....and
>> I
>> am hearing that contesters have been doing this for years !
>>
>> So this is the reason that the 599+40 station can?t hear me! not even a ?
>> sometimes.
>>
>> And here I was naive enough to think there was a rational explanation -
>> this might be because the stations were using directive antennas and were
>> listening in another direction - certainly plausible, I myself have long
>> Beverage antennas which will have this effect....I have even heard this
>> explained as "one way propagation"....
>>
>> I well remember my QSO with KH2L on Top Band a few years ago that was
>> ruined
>> by HB9... who was obviously using a remote receiver to help him hear the
>> DX
>> - the HB9 kept calling completely out of sync about 30 seconds off sync
>> right on top of my transmissions during the QSO, he managed to ruin my QSO
>> completely and it took me a whole year before I heard and worked KH2L
>> again.....I remember there was a russian station who was also calling in
>> sync with the HB9 - both obviously with a similar internet delay.
>>
>> I have decided not to make my Perseus receiver available over the internet
>> anymore because of these issues.
>>
>> Not naming the cheater only serves to create suspicion on other DX
>> stations
>> and ruins the sense of accomplishment in making long haul DX contacts.
>>
>> Any contacts made in this manner are not valid for any award purposes -
>> after all they are simply contacts over the Internet - only by naming the
>> cheaters can we put a stop to these practices - at the very least we
>> should
>> not tolerate this behavior on 160 Meters.
>>
>> 73 Thor, TF4M
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Hello all
>>
>> I have a Software Defined Receiver (SDR) that I make available when I am
>> not using it for others to use. it's an SDR-14 and is usually connected
>> to one of my beverages via a multi-coupler so it hears and performs well
>> Software wise , anyone using sdrradio can connect to it.
>> the latency is alos very low with sdrradio.
>>
>> I am happy to make this available to others because in turn I enjoy
>> using internet connected SDR's provided by others
>>
>> last night however I took a listen to what the connected user was
>> listening to, It turns out that the connected user was a DX station
>> utilising my SDR to work 160m SSB. He had a pileup of EU stations and
>> was utilising my SDR to better hear his pileup.
>> Surely this is 'not on' After all the EU stations may have been able to
>> hear him (although I could not copy him better than about 21 here)
>> But he was using a receiver within Europe to hear the EU stations calling.
>>
>> What is the ethical position on this, it sure seems wrong to me
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> 73
>> Brendan EI6IZ
>> _______________________________________________
>> UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
>
_______________________________________________
UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
|