Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: My take on ARRL 160 (MAR)

To: "Mike & Coreen Smith" <ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca>, "Topband" <Topband@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: My take on ARRL 160 (MAR)
From: "ZR" <zr@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2011 11:52:43 -0500
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>
Low ham population and a small geographical area Mike.

You, or anyone else aint gonna change the ARRL for any reason...its a 
dictatorship.

Carl
KM1H


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Mike & Coreen Smith" <ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca>
To: "Topband" <Topband@contesting.com>
Sent: Sunday, December 04, 2011 10:49 AM
Subject: Re: Topband: My take on ARRL 160 (MAR)


> In a slightly different vein (but keeping with the same theme overall
> theme).....
>
> "MAR" section includes NB (VE9), NS (VE1) and VY2 (PEI).....sometimes MAR
> even included VO1 and VO2 !!!
>
> We have to compete against hams in three provinces for most ARRL contests.
> Does RI get lumped in with EMA and CT? - Nope!
> Does Montana get lumped in with Wyoming and Kansas?  - Nope!
>
> Why is it the ARRL sees it fit to make three provinces compete against one
> another?
> Tell me what other 48 contiguous states compete against one another?
>
> Maybe 50 years ago there was little to no activity in, what was then, 
> always
> VE1, but for most any semi-major or major contest that happens, you will
> work 5-10 MAR stations with VE1, 9 and VY2 prefixes.  We've had separate
> prefixes here since the early 1990's.......approaching 20 yrs !!!
>
> I would rather compete against my province-mates.
>
> Mike VE9AA (NB and proud of it !)
> _______________________________________________
> UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
>
>
> -----
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 10.0.1411 / Virus Database: 2102/4056 - Release Date: 12/04/11
> 

_______________________________________________
UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>