Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: Ticked over intentional interference on top band

To: W2PM <w2pm@aol.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: Ticked over intentional interference on top band
From: Bill Cromwell <wrcromwell@gmail.com>
Reply-to: wrcromwell@gmail.com
Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 11:17:34 -0500
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>
On Sun, 2012-01-22 at 08:07 -0500, W2PM wrote:
> But as someone else mentioned, if a station has a signal problem, and despite 
> how beloved some of our colleagues are I have heard nasty stuff a number of 
> times, there is nothing wrong mentioning it and people shouldn't be upset 
> provided it's not said unconstructively.
> 
> Sent from my iPad
> 

As a matter of fact...

We have that 'uselss' "T" hanging out there on the end of RST (for CW
ops). One year while on the way to Field Day a component lead broke in
the bias supply filter in my transmitter. My first two contacts gave me
a zero for the T and I retired the transmitter for the weekend. We
really should mention it if we observe a problem. Hams should not feel
offended if they get a report like that and reporters should be matter
of fact about it and not insulting. My experiences with incidents like
that are much better than what has been described in this thread.

73,

Bill  KU8H

_______________________________________________
UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>