Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: Patience in ARRL 160 Contest -- copying weak ones

To: Tom W8JI <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: Patience in ARRL 160 Contest -- copying weak ones
From: Herb Schoenbohm <herbs@vitelcom.net>
Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2012 15:33:21 -0400
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>
For Stations located in the tropics and with QRN sometimes in all direction, slowing down is the worst thing to do as getting the missing letters between the static crashes sometimes really helps.

Herb Schoenbohm


On 12/5/2012 1:50 PM, Tom W8JI wrote:
I had this happen many times as well but it is especially annoying near the end of the contest when seeking to find those last few contacts that I heard fellows calling CQ and only sending their call ONCE and then maybe waiting 2 sec. or less before sending CQ again. >>>

160, with changing noise and slow deep fades, really does take different operating methods than higher bands.

When things are slow, it makes much more sense to repeat the call more. Like "test W8JI W8JI W8JI" This is better than adding CQ's "CQ test W8JI", or making a short call "TEST W8JI" and repeating it with little or no pause.

Another thing I try to push, but operators do not like to do, is slowing down when things are slow. If you have to call for 10-30 seconds to get a response, or are only making one QSO a minute, it makes no sense at all to operate at 30 WPM.

160 isn't 40 or 20 meters, with an unlimited supply of stations and almost no noise variation or QSB.


_______________________________________________
Topband reflector - topband@contesting.com

_______________________________________________
Topband reflector - topband@contesting.com

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>