Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: Digial mode spurious issues

To: topband@contesting.com
Subject: Re: Topband: Digial mode spurious issues
From: kr7o@vhfdx.com
Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2014 06:31:48 -0800
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>
Thanks Joe.

I have been using WSJT since 2001 and cringe every time I hear it called a "QRP mode".




> 3.) He was running way way too much power. I never operate with more
> than 30 watts {its a low power mode.. I worked VK5BC with 30w on TB
> ........try that with CW)

JT65 and JT9 are *not* "low power modes.  They are *weak signal* modes
- there is a big difference.  The genesis of Joe Taylor's modes was
EME and meteor scatter communications where "full gallon" transmitters
are normal and signals are still weak.  Nobody with an understanding of
the history of JT4, JT6, JT9, JT65, FSK441, etc. would ever call them
"low power" modes or suggest EME and MS operators run 30 watts or less.

73,

   ... Joe, W4TV



73, Robert KR7O/YB2ARO, DM07ba/OI52ee  (ex.  N7STU)
DXCC  6M #1122
WAZ  6M #112
VUCC  6M, 2M

www.vhfdx.com (KR7O/YB2ARO pages)
Looking for old VHF QSL cards and logbooks.



_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>