Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Topband: Skimmer calibration

To: "Hugh Valentine" <hsvdds@juno.com>
Subject: Topband: Skimmer calibration
From: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Reply-to: Tom W8JI <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2014 07:53:23 -0400
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>


I am not a Skimmer expert, and am just asking. Question: Are all the Skimmers individually(and collectively) calibrated in concert? Can one rely on them for comparing scientific data and conclusion to prove or ascertain a point?Val>>>>

Val,

A live comparison of S/N ratio or relative level over time is with very few exceptions an excellent comparative test. It is much more accurate than S meters or absolute levels without a comparison reference. As such, the RBN is a great tool for evaluating systems.

The problems are:

1.) For determining small differences, less than around 5 dB, you have to know the performance level of the reference antenna or station. (For that reason, I use a simple dipole reference.)

2.) The reference and AUT (antenna under test) have to be reasonably close together to eliminate propagation variances, but not so close as to interact, and they have to be in the clear. For example, it would be foolish for me to plant a dipole in the middle of a bunch of Yagi antennas and call it a reference, or put the antenna being evaluated in an obstructed area.

3.) On skywave, there has to be some time involved with readings averaged over time. This is somewhat true if there is more than a few wavelengths distance between antennas, and especially true (almost critical) when comparing different polarization antennas.

4.) Ideally the reference and AUT should be the same polarization, unless we simply want to know which is louder overall.

5.) Antennas have sweet and sour heights for a given set of conditions. We have to be very careful of this. This is especially true when antennas are more than a half wavelength high above ground, because the antenna pattern will be a series of deep nulls that selectively "notch out" a given wave angle.

The RBN is an excellent tool. It does not need to be calibrated in absolute level, only in dB, and dB to noise is just fine provided the noise level of the receive site is steady.

One thing I hope we all can do is stop acting so "American" (we are now what, 30th or 40th in math and science?) and get back to constructive exchanges of information. If we stop learning and just pick a position and fight, which is our trend today, this becomes a useless hobby and there is no reason to communicate.

73 Tom
_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>