To: | JC <n4is@comcast.net>, topband@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Topband: Non-resonant receive antennas |
From: | "Richard (Rick) Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com> |
Date: | Sun, 21 Dec 2014 12:34:31 -0800 |
List-post: | <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
On 12/21/2014 7:58 AM, JC wrote: This long answer is to validate your observation, resonant dipoles does not provide any difference in receiver performance than your vertical or TX antenna. I didn't say that. I said that there was no difference between a dipole at 30 feet and a dipole at 60 feet. There is often a big improvement in receive on my low dipole vs a vertical, and not just at sun rise. Rick N6RK _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband |
Previous by Date: | Re: Topband: 8 circle: DXE vs Hi-Z, Tom W8JI |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Topband: Recommended Antennas for 160M/80M Receiving, Joel Harrison |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Topband: Non-resonant receive antennas, JC |
Next by Thread: | Re: Topband: Non-resonant receive antennas, Tom W8JI |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |