Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: 160m Sloping Vertical Antenna?

To: "Richard \(Rick\) Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>, "Art Roberts - W5AER" <w5aer@hotmail.com>, <topband@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: 160m Sloping Vertical Antenna?
From: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Reply-to: Tom W8JI <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2014 11:02:26 -0500
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>
More likely it was a mix of groundwave and sky wave, if the station was local, cancelling or reinforcing signal as phase shifted on the sky wave path.


----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard (Rick) Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
To: "Art Roberts - W5AER" <w5aer@hotmail.com>; <topband@contesting.com>
Sent: Wednesday, December 24, 2014 9:23 PM
Subject: Re: Topband: 160m Sloping Vertical Antenna?




On 12/24/2014 3:39 PM, Art Roberts - W5AER wrote:
On the thought of a low dipole:

Years ago in Northern California, as an experiment, I had a VERY low
dipole and got some strange results. Listening to a local station, in
the afternoon, there was very deep QSB. We were able to talk, but with
difficulty.

73,
Art  W5AER


Were you cross polarized; IE was the other station running a vertical?
If so, minor fluctuations in propagation could result in major
fluctations of polarization cancellation.

Rick N6RK
_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband


-----
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2014.0.4794 / Virus Database: 4253/8802 - Release Date: 12/24/14


_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>