| To: | mikestahoe@sbcglobal.net |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Topband: 2 wl loop, worth the effort? |
| From: | Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com> |
| Date: | Wed, 2 Dec 2015 14:25:59 -0600 |
| List-post: | <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
Model a low 1-wl loop, and you'll see why it was quieter. 1. There's not quite as much low-angle response. Most local noise comes from very low angles. 2. More ground loss. 73, Mike www.w0btu.com On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 2:07 PM, <mikestahoe@sbcglobal.net> wrote: > two years of playing on 160 the 1 wave length loop was quieter but didnt > have the coverage of the dipole, > _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Topband: 2 wl loop, worth the effort?, mikestahoe |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Topband: 2 wl loop, worth the effort?, Mike Waters |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Topband: 2 wl loop, worth the effort?, mikestahoe |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Topband: 2 wl loop, worth the effort?, Mike Waters |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |