Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: 2 wl loop, worth the effort?

To: mikestahoe@sbcglobal.net
Subject: Re: Topband: 2 wl loop, worth the effort?
From: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2015 14:43:42 -0600
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>
Forget I said all that. I looked at the model and found some possible
mistakes. And I don't have any more time now to fix it.

73, Mike
www.w0btu.com

On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 2:35 PM, Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> I have an EZNEC model of a low loop, if someone wants it.
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 2:25 PM, Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Model a low 1-wl loop, and you'll see why it was quieter.
>>
>> 1. There's not quite as much low-angle response. Most local noise comes
>> from very low angles.
>> 2. More ground loss.
>>
>> 73, Mike
>> www.w0btu.com
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 2:07 PM, <mikestahoe@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>>
>>> two years of playing on 160 the 1 wave length loop was quieter but didnt
>>> have the coverage of the dipole,
>>>
>>
>>
>
_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>