| To: | Rob Atkinson <ranchorobbo@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Topband: 160 m inverted L |
| From: | Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com> |
| Date: | Tue, 8 Nov 2016 17:58:26 -0600 |
| List-post: | <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
I fully agree. And wide plate spacing isn't either, even at the legal limit! I used an omega match (with two capacitors and no inductors) to match the coax to my 160m inverted-L. The largest one in the photo on my site is overkill, it's what I had. 73, Mike www.w0btu.com On Nov 8, 2016 4:55 PM, "Rob Atkinson" <ranchorobbo@gmail.com> wrote: > > A vacuum variable for L impedance matching is unnecessary. _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband |
| Previous by Date: | Re: Topband: 160 m inverted L, Mike Smith VE9AA |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Topband: Hi Gain Preamps, Noise Figure Comparison (KD9SV 994 x5, W1FB, W7IUV preamps), JC |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Topband: 160 m inverted L, Grant Saviers |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Topband: 160 m inverted L, Rob Atkinson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |