Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: AM interference on 1840

To: "'Jorge Diez - CX6VM'" <cx6vm.jorge@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: AM interference on 1840
From: "Edward Sawyer" <sawyered@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 21 May 2019 10:10:32 -0400
List-post: <mailto:topband@contesting.com>
Jorge.  I agree the harmonics are not acceptable.  But between fishing buoys 
and other birdie type QRN, moving around to find a clear frequency is not new 
to 160M, nor ham radio in general.  Its part of what we do.  As soon as 
something channelizes – its very limited quickly.

 

Ed  N1UR

 

From: Jorge Diez - CX6VM [mailto:cx6vm.jorge@gmail.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2019 8:50 AM
To: Edward Sawyer
Cc: GEORGE WALLNER; TopBand List
Subject: Re: Topband: AM interference on 1840

 

Ed

 

FT8 can move, but 1840 still is useless to do CW, so is not a FT8 problem

 

George said the two big problems, hope this not increase with harmonics

 

73,

Jorge

CX6VM/CW5W

 

El mar., 21 may. 2019 a las 8:52, Edward Sawyer (<sawyered@earthlink.net>) 
escribió:

I agree with the 2 messages.  But there is a 3rd.  The inability for the FT8 
crowd to QSY around some interference.  Interference is a fact of life.  And we 
have QSY’s around it (even as it is being worked) for a century.



Ed  N1UR



From: GEORGE WALLNER [mailto:aa7jv@atlanticbb.net] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2019 7:50 AM
To: Edward Sawyer; topband@contesting.com
Subject: Re: Topband: AM interference on 1840



There are two messages in this topic: One is the interference from this 
particular BC station. Not a crisis, not yet. Two is a warning: Newly installed 
solid-state AM broadcast amplifiers in poorly regulated regions, over time, 
will have the potential to fill the entire 160 meter band with harmonics. The 
second part is not trivial and should be a heads-up. The earlier we find ways 
to deal with it, the better.



73,

George,

AA7JV



On Tue, 21 May 2019 05:32:24 -0400

"Edward Sawyer" <sawyered@earthlink.net> wrote:

While the harmonic interference is unacceptable and needs to be dealt with,

isn't this only "a crisis" because of the simplistic FT8 solution of

bunching everyone up on a small channel? It reminds me of the old CB days

when something would happen on a certain channel but no one would move

because they have always had the radio on channel 2 and that's where all

their buddies are. Or the 75M pig farmers that refuse to move but complain

and harass on QRM that was there before their daily time started.



For those of us using CW on topband, this isn't a real problem except for a

contest weekend. And honestly, it will just get moved around, like the

Middle East jammer on 3807.



73



Ed N1UR



_________________

Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector



_________________
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector




 

-- 

73,
Jorge
CX6VM/CW5W

_________________
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>