| To: | <towertalk@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [TowerTalk] 70-ft Debris Radius? |
| From: | crb@nanoteq.com (Chris R. Burger) |
| Date: | Fri, 4 Apr 1997 10:00:33 +200 |
> this notion would only apply to towers that are high relative to the > length. Of course, this typo was only noticed after I'd sent the post. Let's try: "...relative to the width." Chris R. Burger ZS6EZ -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owner-towertalk@contesting.com |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [TowerTalk] 70-ft Debris Radius?, Chris R. Burger |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [TowerTalk] 70-ft Debris Radius?, Scott Bullock |
| Previous by Thread: | [TowerTalk] 70-ft Debris Radius?, Chris R. Burger |
| Next by Thread: | [TowerTalk] 70-ft Debris Radius?, Scott Bullock |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |