| To: | <towertalk@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [TowerTalk] Guyed crankup towers obsolete? |
| From: | harpole@pegasus.cc.ucf.edu (Charles H. Harpole) |
| Date: | Thu, 27 Nov 1997 00:33:30 -0500 (EST) |
Guying a crankup , as someone on here already said some weeks ago, adds a lot of downward loading onto the crankup cables and other parts of the crankup system. How much loading is up to the engin-ears, but I would not do it just on the safe side. DE K4VUD -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owner-towertalk@contesting.com Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [TowerTalk] Guyed crankup towers obsolete?, Richard Karlquist |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [TowerTalk] Aluminum Self-Supporting Towers, Dave Bowker |
| Previous by Thread: | [TowerTalk] Guyed crankup towers obsolete?, Tom Osborne |
| Next by Thread: | [TowerTalk] Guyed crankup towers obsolete?, Robert W5AJ |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |