My single band 10, 15, and 20 beams (HyGain 5 el) are much quieter than my
removed TH-7. And all the new ones are plumber's delight! de K4VUD
On Wed, 29 Apr 1998, Kenneth D. Grimm wrote:
> >It's the same electrical design with a lot of
> > hardware improvements including 90-100 mph wind rating, phillystran truss,
> > insulated reflector (using the same hardware pictured in the X7/X9 ads),
> > and a balun.
>
> This comment got me to wondering what the advantages of insulated
> parasitic elements on a beam are. Tom, of Force 12, whose antennas use
> insulated parasitic elements on yagis once commented that if you
> believed that by removing the insulation and directly grounding the
> elements to the boom, in plumber's delight fashion, would produce a
> quieter antenna, then go ahead and do it. My question is, why have
> antenna designers decided to insulate anything other than the driven
> element in the first place? Has anyone actually bothered to test the
> idea that grounding the elements of a yagi produce a "quieter" antenna
> than one with the parasitic elements insulated?
>
> 73,
> --
> Ken K4XL
> grimm@lynchburg.net
> Boatanchor Manual Archive - ftp://198.28.36.115/pub
>
>
> --
> FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
> Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com
> Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
> Problems: owner-towertalk@contesting.com
> Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search
>
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-towertalk@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search
|