[email protected] wrote:
<snip>
>IMO, any worry about such minor "loss" is silly when compared to the
>inconvenience. This is especially true since people never even bother
>adding five or ten 120 foot wires on the ground below the antenna even
>though that causes much greater improvement in field strength than any
>change caused by making the dipole "flat" or "Vee'd".
>
<snip>
Tom --
Can you quantify this effect? How many db could one expect to improve
a dipole over poor or over good ground? Are there any references to
this effect?
Do you place the wires in parallel with the dipole, or radially around
your towers/supports? Does it matter?
Thanks. Sounds like an easy, inexpensive way to get some signal
improvement.
Tom - N1MM
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
Submissions: [email protected]
Administrative requests: [email protected]
Problems: [email protected]
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
|