| To: | <[email protected]> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [TowerTalk] Small 160 M receiving Antennas |
| From: | [email protected] (James P. Cassidy) |
| Date: | Fri, 1 Jan 1999 14:53:29 -0500 |
I would like any input I can get on effectiveness of the EWE antennas or shortened slinky beverage antennas. I don't have room for full size beverages. From what I have heard so far there is dispute regarding how well these work. Please reply direct, unless you think everyone would be interested. TNX ,HNY 73 Jim KI7Y -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html Submissions: [email protected] Administrative requests: [email protected] Problems: [email protected] Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [TowerTalk] Re: Pencil marks (are BAD!), Bill Aycock |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [TowerTalk] TX Ant gain vs. RX Ant gain (was: Dollars per dB), Scott Townley |
| Previous by Thread: | [TowerTalk] Re: Pencil marks (are BAD!), Bill Aycock |
| Next by Thread: | [TowerTalk] Small 160 M receiving Antennas, Mike Anderson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |