On Sun, 30 Jun 2002 10:54:12 -0700, Al Williams wrote:
> At our clubs bi-weekly meeting the president conducting the meeting
> always speaks a phrase containing "... for the good of the order..."
> I seems to me that a 95-foot regulation would definitely be
> overwhelmingly for the "good of the order".
There shouldn't be a specified limit. Each case should be considered on its
own merit. Placing a 95 foot limit in one area and then having that copied
in another doesn't judge each on its own. That would be like the city near
me adapting a 55' limit and then the county doing the same thing, just
because. I can put a tower up several hundred feet tall. The county
doesn't care. Common sense should rule, but I know some areas have just
plain ran out of such a thing.
Gary
a g 0 n at a r r l dot n e t
http colon slash slash mcduffie dot ws
--
|