Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

[Towertalk] NY State antenna legislation

To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: [Towertalk] NY State antenna legislation
From: WL7M" <joe@xyz.net (WL7M)
Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2002 12:47:22 -0800 (Alaskan Daylight Time)
And here in Alaska, those of us living in the "bush" are authorized a 200
foot tower under the State of Alaska PRB-1. That's the way we wrote it -
depending upon the degree of "civilization" around us.

73,
Joe
WL7M
Fritz Creek, Alaska 
(AKA "The Bush")

-------Original Message-------

From: SavageBR@aol.com
To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Date: Sunday, June 30, 2002 12:10:45
To: jljarvis@adelphia.net; towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [Towertalk] NY State antenna legislation

In a message dated 6/30/2002 1:49:20 PM Eastern Daylight Time, 
jljarvis@adelphia.net writes:


> It would be inappropriate--and probably negative in impact, 
> for out of state hams to comment on a NY legislative matter.
> 
> However, if this law does, indeed, specify a 95 foot limit, it's a 
> gross mistake. Right now, PRB-1 allows an application for "the 
> intended purpose." 95 feet is barely adequate for stacked antennas
> on 10 and 15. It is sub-optimal on 20. It is inadequate for a 40m yagi
> unless your intended purpose is domestic communications. It is inadequate 
> for an 80 meter dipole, for international work, and it is inadequate for a

> 160 meter vertical, for pete's sake.
> 
You must live in a different world. Most of the Ham community would be quite

pleased with HF antennas allowed up to 95 ft.

Bruce


--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
text/plain (text body -- kept)
text/html
---
_______________________________________________
Towertalk mailing list
Towertalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>