To: | <towertalk@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | [Towertalk] Coax opinions |
From: | kq2m@mags.net (Robert Shohet) |
Date: | Wed, 7 Aug 2002 21:16:01 -0400 |
Hi John, > > > >RG213 with the > >non-contaminating jacket (suitable for direct burial) > > Bob-- > > Just as long as you don't equate non-contaminating with > suitable for direct burial. They are two different things. > > Non-contaminating means that the plasticizers in the > jacket won't migrate through the braid and into the > dielectric and degrade performance (increase loss). > > Direct burial means that it has a special jacket that > has no pin holes or has a filler type sealant that > eliminates any leakage of water into the cable > and keeps it from migrating through the braid, > thereby increasing losses. Thanks for the explanation. The coax does have a non-contaminating jacket and is meant for direct burial - I believe it is the buryflex coax that was mentioned in another post. 73 Bob KQ2M |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [Towertalk] Coax opinions, W0UN--John Brosnahan |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [Towertalk] Cable Clamps and Phillystran, W0UN--John Brosnahan |
Previous by Thread: | [Towertalk] Coax opinions, W0UN--John Brosnahan |
Next by Thread: | [Towertalk] Coax opinions, W0UN--John Brosnahan |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |