Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

[TowerTalk] Location location

To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: [TowerTalk] Location location
From: w7ry@centurytel.net (Jim)
Date: Sun Apr 6 16:04:13 2003
AGREED!

Great points.
I just purchaced a home in April of last year. I put a statement into the
written offer that I made on the home that I did end up buying.

The statement was "If there are ANY CC&Rs that prohibit antenna
installation, the offer is null and void". There are some CC&Rs that
prohibit riding of ORVs on the road, no junk cars, no excessive noise after
10:00 PM etc... Just the kind you want!

We have a small association for the maintiance of the private paved road to
include 2 bridges that cross over some small creeks.

Simple enough.

73 and thanks!
Jim W7RY

----- Original Message -----
From: "WD4K" <Ttow1@charter.net>
To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Sent: Sunday, April 06, 2003 11:09 AM
Subject: [TowerTalk] Location location


> First of all, I am a Broker, own my company and have trained and taught
Real
> Estate for many years. Some of this Realtor bashing comes from a complete
> and total misunderstanding of what you should expect from your Realtor.
Your
> Realtor is NOT an expert in antennas nor should be expected to be. In fact
> it is ILLEGAL for your Realtor to give you advice on matters pertaining to
> anything involving legal or the interpretation of such, especially outside
> their area of expertise. The Realtors job is to provide professional
> services in finding and closing a home of YOUR choice. Our computer search
> engines have no provisions for antenna restrictions.
> I used my MLS service to find my home----Then I personally went to the
codes
> and zoning offices to get the information important to me about my towers.
> This is YOUR job to satisfy your needs, NOT your Realtors. If you are
> concerned about the interpretations of the many documents concerning
> restrictions you need to hire your own attorney.
>
> To make this simple:  Allow your Realtor to do their job, help you find
the
> house of your liking, help you get it financed and closed. That and ONLY
> that is their job. Once you have found a house, or a subdivision that you
> like, write up the contract/offer "SUBJECT TO" your approval of "whatever
> your personal concerns are",  call an Attorney, express your concerns and
> explain your needs and have them go over the restrictions. Your agent will
> be happy to work with the Attorney in acquiring the documents you need.
> You would not ask your Attorney to do the Realtors job so don't ask the
> Realtor to do the job for you and your legal advisors.
> I am personally insulted by some of the comments lumping Realtors as money
> grubbing and lacking professionalism. I have always provided terrific
> service and high standards of professionalism to other Realtors, agents
and
> customers, be they buyers or sellers. I have taught Attorneys about the
Real
> Estate business and have had books written about Real Estate by Attorneys,
> crediting me with teaching them the Real Estate Investment business.  So
do
> NOT include me in these baseless insults about "Realtors".
> It is a fine industry with as many laws insuring professional actions and
> personal integrity as those governing Attorneys. As far as the comment
about
> only caring about commissions--that is a stupid and irresponsible comment.
I
> have always taught new agents that what they earn is simply payment for a
> job well done and completed. It is a byproduct of the quality of service
> which they provide to their customers. Just like any other industry, there
> are good, better and best Realtors--it is YOUR job to find one with whom
you
> have a comfort level.
> My advice to you Realtor haters--go do it by yourself. I have found that
it
> is much better for all concerned to show your types to the door and deal
> with intelligent, responsible and logical individuals who understand the
> process and have reasonable expectations.
> Last comment:  NO Realtor should EVER interpret any legal documents for
your
> benefit. This is stretchable to them practicing law without a license and
is
> illegal---so don't ask them... get out of your recliner and do some
legwork
> yourself...this is your hobby...not theirs.
> 73, Tommy WD4K
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: towertalk-bounces@contesting.com
> [mailto:towertalk-bounces@contesting.com]On Behalf Of
> towertalk-request@contesting.com
> Sent: Saturday, April 05, 2003 11:08 AM
> To: towertalk@contesting.com
> Subject: TowerTalk Digest, Vol 4, Issue 8
>
>
> Send TowerTalk mailing list submissions to
> towertalk@contesting.com
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> towertalk-request@contesting.com
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> towertalk-owner@contesting.com
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of TowerTalk digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. Re: ATB 34 manual (Jim Smith)
>    2. 2-el yagi gain vs boom length (Pete Smith)
>    3. Re: Location Location? (Chuck Counselman)
>    4. Re: 30 height restriction (Dave Hachadorian)
>    5. Re: Location Location? (Larry L Lindblom)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
> Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2003 00:50:15 -0800
> From: Jim Smith <jimsmith@shaw.ca>
> To: towertalk@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] ATB 34 manual
> Message-ID: <3E8E98C7.6060604@shaw.ca>
> References: <3E8E058B.9EA86953@atlantic.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT
> Precedence: list
> Message: 1
>
> John,
>
> How about uploading it to BAMA.  http://bama.sbc.edu/
>
> 73 de Jim Smith    VE7FO
>
> blkcat28 wrote:
>
> >  If anyone else need a copy, I'll scan it and post it on the web for
> >everyone.  I'll give you the address after it's posted.
> >
> >John KB4CRT
> >
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
> Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2003 08:39:09 -0500
> From: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
> To: towertalk <towertalk@contesting.com>
> Subject: [TowerTalk] 2-el yagi gain vs boom length
> Message-ID: <5.2.0.9.2.20030405083633.0492dc60@pop.dc2.adelphia.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Precedence: list
> Message: 2
>
> Can someone who has W2PV's book tell me what he says is the nominal
> free-space gain of a 2-element 40m DE/reflector yagi on an 18 foot
(roughly
> .27 wavelength) boom?  I'm doing some modeling of a shortened yagi with
> that boomlength and want a point of reference.
>
> Thanks!
>
> 73, Pete N4ZR
>
> ------------------------------
>
To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
> Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2003 11:12:06 -0500
> From: Chuck Counselman <ccc@space.mit.edu>
> To: towertalk@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Location Location?
> Message-ID: <p0432042dbab4ae10280a@[192.168.0.2]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed"
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Precedence: list
> Message: 3
>
> At 8:30 AM -0500 4/5/03, a TowerTalker replied to me off-list:
> >I could not agree with you more about real estate agents. We are
> >moving south and no matter what I say about not being interested in
> >any place with any restrictions I'm told, "Well, the restrictions
> >are very light" or, "I'm sure they wouldn't mind an antenna as long
> >as it's not too tall". Yeah, right! I'm sure they'll allow a couple
> >of 85 footers with stacked arrays. We finally found a great spot but
> >it took a LOT of searching.
> >       When I see these Realtor ads on TV crowing about their alleged
> >"concern" for the buyers, I get disgusted.
>
>
> Please understand that my original comment and my forwarding of this
> one come not from a grudge against real-estate agents, but from a
> desire to share with other hams what I and my fellow TowerTalker
> learned in the course of shopping for a tower-friendly QTH.  My
> experience was eye-opening.  It would have helped me, and saved me a
> lot of wasted time, to have been told these things in advance.
>
> 73 -Chuck, W1HIS
> ------------------------------
>
To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
> Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2003 09:32:47 +0000
> From: Dave Hachadorian <k6ll@juno.com>
> To: towertalk@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] 30 height restriction
> Message-ID: <20030405.093828.-365863.1.K6LL@juno.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> Precedence: list
> Message: 4
>
>
>
> On Sat, 5 Apr 2003 03:13:50 -0000 "Bob Puharic" <wf3h@ptd.net> writes:
> > Just bought a house, and township has 30' height restriction.
> > Township manager and zoning officer were unaware of any
> > restrictions, and didn't know about PRB-1. Reviewing literature on
> > this and discussing it with ARRL seems to indicate a 30' is pretty
> > easily overruled. Township manager has invited me to write note to
> > township solicitor addressing issue with her. Anyone have experience
> > in this? Apparently it doesn't seem to be a problem getting this
> > knocked out in favor of something more favorable.
> >
> > Bob/WF3H
>
> Many zoning ordinances contain something like the following,
> from the City of Yuma, Arizona.
>
> "Exceptions to Height Limits: The provisions of this section
> shall not apply to church spires, domes, belfries, cupolas,
> monuments, water tank towers, fire towers, observation
> towers, transmission towers, windmills, chimneys, smoke stacks,
> silos, derricks, conveyors, flag poles and aerials and their
> necessary supports...."
>
> Are there any church steeples, power poles, flag poles,
> water towers, etc. higher than 30 feet in town? Did they
> all have to get a variance?
>
> Dave Hachadorian, K6LL
> Yuma, AZ
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> .
>
> ------------------------------
>
To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
> Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2003 16:41:44 +0000
> From: Larry L Lindblom <llindblom@juno.com>
> To: ccc@space.mit.edu
> Cc: towertalk@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Location Location?
> Message-ID: <20030405.164144.-488261.1.LLindblom@juno.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> Precedence: list
> Message: 5
>
> I had good luck with a real estate agent helping me find a QTH here in
> central IA with no antenna restrictions.  He just happened to be a ham
> (W0DQ).  Maybe that helps or I was just lucky this time.
>
> W0ETC
>
> On Sat, 5 Apr 2003 11:12:06 -0500 Chuck Counselman <ccc@space.mit.edu>
> writes:
> > At 8:30 AM -0500 4/5/03, a TowerTalker replied to me off-list:
> > >I could not agree with you more about real estate agents. We are
> > >moving south and no matter what I say about not being interested in
> >
> > >any place with any restrictions I'm told, "Well, the restrictions
> > >are very light" or, "I'm sure they wouldn't mind an antenna as long
> >
> > >as it's not too tall". Yeah, right! I'm sure they'll allow a couple
> >
> > >of 85 footers with stacked arrays. We finally found a great spot
> > but
> > >it took a LOT of searching.
> > >       When I see these Realtor ads on TV crowing about their
> > alleged
> > >"concern" for the buyers, I get disgusted.
> >
> >
> > Please understand that my original comment and my forwarding of this
> >
> > one come not from a grudge against real-estate agents, but from a
> > desire to share with other hams what I and my fellow TowerTalker
> > learned in the course of shopping for a tower-friendly QTH.  My
> > experience was eye-opening.  It would have helped me, and saved me a
> >
> > lot of wasted time, to have been told these things in advance.
> >
> > 73 -Chuck, W1HIS
> > _______________________________________________
> >
> > See: http://www.mscomputer.com  for "Self Supporting Towers",
> > "Wireless Weather Stations", and lot's more.  Call Toll Free,
> > 1-800-333-9041 with any questions and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > TowerTalk mailing list
> > TowerTalk@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
> >
> >
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>
>
> End of TowerTalk Digest, Vol 4, Issue 8
> ***************************************
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> See: http://www.mscomputer.com  for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless
Weather Stations", and lot's more.  Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any
questions and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>