Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Re: Thrust bearing

To: "(Reflector) TowerTalk" <towertalk@contesting.com>,"Chuck Lewis" <clewis@knology.net>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Re: Thrust bearing
From: "Jerry Keller" <k3bz@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2004 16:46:33 -0400
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Chuck Lewis 
  To: Jerry Keller 
  Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2004 4:21 PM
  Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Re: Thrust bearing



  ----- Original Message ----- 

   I figure the less weight that bears on the rotator, the longer it will
  last.... and TB's are cheaper than rotators!

  N4NM comment:

      I have always been taught that ball and roller bearings must be properly
  preloaded to prolong life. Granted, these rotor bearings are running at
  really slow speed, so it's not the same issue as a wheel bearing on a race
  car, but intuition tells me that axial loading (within manufacturer's specs)
  is beneficial in maintaining bearing alignment and reacting against lateral
  (shear) loads through the plane of the bearing. I seem to remember seeing
  that corroborated by a rotor manufacturer, but I can't quote the specifics.
  Can anyone with some credentials weigh in here? Having a "thrust" bearing to
  take the vertical load is like Mom and Apple Pie. If it's a misconception,
  we need to refute it, but if the "thrust" bearing tradition is correct, I
  need to crawl into my hole and shut up.

  73,
  Chuck, N4NM




_______________________________________________

See: http://www.mscomputer.com  for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather 
Stations", and lot's more.  Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any questions 
and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.

_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>