| To: | Tom Rauch <w8ji@contesting.com>, towertalk@contesting.com | 
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TowerTalk] verticals in woods vs. in a field | 
| From: | Doug Renwick <ve5ra@sasktel.net> | 
| Reply-to: | ve5ra@sasktel.net | 
| Date: | Thu, 16 Sep 2004 09:54:10 -0600 | 
| List-post: | <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com> | 
Tom,I appreciate your level headed approach to this subject and many others. There is a tendency to spin opinions into fact either on purpose or by flawed thinking. As an analytical chemist for many years I know all about false positive and false negative test results. Personally, theory is just a starting point. The real result, as you state, is the A-B test using reliable methods. Tom Rauch wrote: One key way to sort through all this is to ask people how they know something. If someone hasn't done an actual A-B test using reliable methods, the data is just a guess. Unless someone has FS data, it is just a guess or personal opinion. 
 _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather Stations", and lot's more. Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any questions and ask for Sherman, W2FLA. _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk  | 
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] followup question on verticals in trees, Larry Phipps | 
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] Delta Loop Info and Opinions?, Joe Giacobello | 
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] verticals in woods vs. in a field, Tom Rauch | 
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] verticals in woods vs. in a field, Al Williams | 
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |