Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Tower and property values

To: <towertalk@contesting.com>, <K7LXC@aol.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Tower and property values
From: "RICHARD BOYD" <ke3q@msn.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2005 19:33:09 -0500
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
Adding a serious comment to my previous "tongue in cheek" one, this could be 
further evidence that towers do not, indeed, lower property values:

1.  Do local jurisdictions lower your tax assessment or your neighbors' tax 
assessment because they believe the towers have depressed the property 
values?  I don't THINK so!  In effect, the government (the ones with 
property taxing authority) are officially, on the record, stating it as a 
fact that the towers have no effect on the property values.  If someone were 
actually to sue over a claim like this, I can picture the local taxing 
authorities being called to testify.  Seems like powerful evidence to me.

73 - Rich, KE3Q


----- Original Message ----- 
From: <K7LXC@aol.com>
To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Sent: Friday, February 04, 2005 6:54 PM
Subject: [TowerTalk] Tower and property values


> Howdy, TowerTalkians --
>
> I pulled this off the ham-law reflector and I thought you'd be interested 
> in it.
>
> Cheers,
> Steve    K7LXC
> TOWER TECH -
> Professional tower services for commercial and amateur
>
> >> From: T. Kenneth Lewis [mailto:tkenneth@frontiernet.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2005 5:50 AM
> To: awextra
> Subject: Towers and "lowering property values"
> Importance: High
>
>
> I read the article on the Arizona battle for the radio tower and the 
> classic line about "lowering property values" was of interest to me. You 
> see, I have heard this line (or more properly, lie) for so long and it 
> wasn't until I had received training and licensure as a real estate 
> appraiser that I fully understood just how false that line is! In all my 
> training there was never any mention of how ham radio antenna towers could 
> lower property values!
>
> If I may suggest, the nest time this lie comes up, have the attorney(s) 
> representing the ham operator(s) and/or club(s) get an appraiser to 
> testify to the "validity" of the claims of diminished property value. That 
> should shoot a broadside into the whole argument that will sink it!
>
> Respectfully submitted,
>
> T. Kenneth Lewis, K3FMK
>
> P. S. I am no longer working as an appraiser, but felt this little bit of 
> information had to be given to someone who could make a difference! Good 
> luck!
> _______________________________________________________
> The Ham-Law Mailing List. This list is for discussion and does not
> purport to give legal advice.
>
> Submissions:  ham-law@altlaw.com
> Subscribe and unsubscribe:    listservert@altlaw.com
> Use "(un)subscribe ham-law@altlaw.com" on a new line in the text.
>
> _______________________________________________________
> The Ham-Law Mailing List. This list is for discussion and does not
> purport to give legal advice.
>
> Submissions:  ham-law@altlaw.com >>
> _______________________________________________
>
> See: http://www.mscomputer.com  for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless 
> Weather Stations", and lot's more.  Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with 
> any questions and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
> 
_______________________________________________

See: http://www.mscomputer.com  for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather 
Stations", and lot's more.  Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any questions 
and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.

_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>