Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Why copper ground road and not stainless???

To: Beat Meier <mbe_ml@swiss-wireless.com.ar>,TT Forum <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Why copper ground road and not stainless???
From: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 06:31:24 -0700
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
At 05:22 AM 7/25/2007, Beat Meier wrote:
>Hello
>
>Why everybody is using copper ground roads?

Tradition and history.
If you're installing a ground rod for regulatory compliance, some 
sets of rules require copper.

The National Electrical Code does not require a copper rod, only that 
if it's made of iron or steel that it be galvanized or otherwise 
protected from corrosion (which your stainless steel rod would certainly do).

Why not use stainless "roads" but not even round so we will have much
>more contact to earth say a stainless road like an V:
>
>    /\
>  /   \
>/      \
>
>with side of about 1.25'' (3cm) and thickness of 1/8'' (3mm)


Sure.. I think it's more a matter of tradition.  Historically, a 
plain round rod is cheaper than any rolled form.


_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>