> Wonder why one has to to buy a book to get aware of that.
One doesn't have to buy a book to be aware of that. The information
is widely discussed by those who know the antenna.
73,
... Joe, W4TV
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com
> [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Peter Voelpel
> Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2007 2:08 PM
> To: cq-contest@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] [TowerTalk] Skyhawk, KT36XA,
> opinions requested
>
>
> At least that explains something, small capacity changes,
> especially at a
> current node effectively retune antennas.
>
> Wonder why one has to to buy a book to get aware of that.
>
> 73
> Peter
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com
> [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Dave
> Hachadorian
>
> Regarding KT-34XA anomalies:
>
> Toward the end of KLM's production run of XA's, they
> mistakenly shipped some
> antennas where the 16" length capacitor tubes had a wall
> thickness of .058"
> instead of the correct .049". This error totally degraded
> the performance
> of the antenna. Steve and Ward's Antenna Comparison Report
> apparently used
> one of these bad antennas in their testing, so the results are totally
> non-representative of either a correctly functioning KLM or
> M2 unit.
>
> Dave Hachadorian, K6LL
> Yuma, AZ
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
>
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|