Rick-
Why introduce this into this thread? The models you mention do not resemble
the Cage dipole, so why?
There is enough distortion of the claims and references (eg, vertical 1/4
wave) already. To really help, try modeling a real cage? The pertinent
dimensions are easy to get, and a dipole for comparison should be easy. The
claim that "Time Diversity" applies is ludicrous.
Bill--W4BSG
----- Original Message -----
From: "Rick Stealey" <rstealey@hotmail.com>
To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Sent: Saturday, April 11, 2009 8:53 PM
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Cage dipole revisited.
>
> Today I did a little modeling with 4NEC2 on 80 meters. First a regular
> dipole showed a bandwidth of 200 KHz at the SWR=2:1 points.
> Then I decided to see how close to a real cage a pair of dipoles has to be
> to get the same benefit. So I added another dipole, fan style, to it and
> got 320 KHz bandwidth. I varied the length of the second dipole all over
> the place. I was modeling on 80 meters, and made the 2nd dipole small
> (like the length of a 40 m dipole) and could see SWR dips in the 80m and
> 40m bands when I did a frequency sweep. Then I lengthend the small dipole
> and watched the 2nd dip drop in frequency till it got close to the 80 m
> band and the bandwidth began increasing. But I was never able to get a
> "double hump" inside the 80m band as I had hoped.
> But 320 KHz bandwidth was easily obtained.
> Now the question is, how different is a pair of dipoles (with 10-20
> degrees angle between them)from a real cage dipole ? So to do this I
> modeled three dipoles, parallel to each other and separated a few feet
> apart. The bandwidth was the same as the fan, indicating to me that very
> likely a simple two dipole fan antenna (both elements can be the same
> length) will give good swr performance compared to a dipole and might be
> worth the effort. Sure would be simple to build compared to a cage
>
> Rick K2XT
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Rediscover Hotmail®: Get quick friend updates right in your inbox.
> http://windowslive.com/RediscoverHotmail?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_HM_Rediscover_Updates1_042009
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>
>
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|