Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Spammed by Tea Party mailing from M2

To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Spammed by Tea Party mailing from M2
From: Timothy Coker <n6win73@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2010 17:59:44 -0700
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
My bet is it was spoofed or he was hacked. Usually that's what I am seeing
now.

It's also silly that two guys would publicly flame the second poster when:

"It certainly took Mike’s company down a notch in my estimation (*and would
have done so regardless of my political leanings*)."

Shows that the original poster was making a political statement himself. It
would have been better class for you guys to tell both people to knock it
off...

Tim, N6WIN.

On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 5:27 PM, Dino Darling <dino@kx6d.com> wrote:

> Mike's stock just went up (if it could get any higher than it is
> already) with me!
>
> However, I doubt that Mike would use his company's e-mail list in this
> manner.
>
> Dino - KX6D
>
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: [TowerTalk] Spammed by Tea Party mailing from M2
> From: wyc <wycpublic@gmail.com>
> Date: Sun, July 25, 2010 9:50 am
> To: towertalk@contesting.com
> Cc: k6myc@m2inc.com
>
>  I was disappointed to receive an unsolicited mass-emailing last night
> forwarded from Mike Staal, K6MYC of m2inc.com (addressed to Ken Holladay
> K6HCP, but apparently bcc’d to me and others), re “Prop 106 AZ: How
> to beat
> Obamacare in Arizona” – a mailing directed to "Tea Party leaders,
> conservative activists, and bloggers," with which I won’t further
> clutter
> this list.
>
> I would suggest vendors think twice (and more) about using their lists
> of
> ham- (and worse, antenna-) related email addresses to engage in
> political
> advocacy. It certainly took Mike’s company down a notch in my
> estimation
> (and would have done so regardless of my political leanings).
>
> Sorry for burdening the list with this only peripherally antenna-related
> post, but by highlighting such conduct, perhaps its use might be
> attenuated…
>
> 73,
>
> /Bill
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>