Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Climbing

To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Climbing
From: "D Calder" <towertalk@n4zkf.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2010 07:34:14 -0400
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
> But I find I don't trust the opinions of any hams. Like I can't imagine a
conversation about the side loading of pelican hooks and new standards with
a ham. Or the benefits of a webbing wrap for a tie off, as opposed >to a
metal hook. Or how a bad clip can cause a torquing action that opens the
gate on a biner/hook.

Then you have no idea how many hams are in the telecom field and are
professionals at what they do. I recognize some on this group I work with.
First we don't work on lbs., it's kilonewtons like is on the side of what
you talk about. We use triple self-locking, not nose-hooked because it can
fail at less
than 10% of its rated closed gate strength which is less than 2 kN.

If you care to go on, we can do it off this thread as it's been beaten to
death.

73 Dave n4zkf



-kevin
ad6z



_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>