I forgot to state that my earlier posting referred to directivity at lower
elevation angles than the peak lobes.
al
----- Original Message -----
From: "Al Williams" <alwilliams@olywa.net>
To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2010 4:16 PM
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Radiation pattern for SteppIR 80 meter dipole
> According to my EZNEC, the directivity is actually opposite to this
> postings
> response? The higher the flat dipole on 80, the less directivity!
> The problem is that the peak gain of the lower dipole, although of greater
> directivity is also much less than for the higher dipole.
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Rick Stealey" <rstealey@hotmail.com>
> To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2010 7:28 AM
> Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Radiation pattern for SteppIR 80 meter dipole
>
>
>>
>>
>>> Anyone have an idea of the radiation pattern obtained with the SteppIR
>>> 80
>>> meter dipole on the DB36. Which way to point the antenna?
>>>
>>> Fred K3BHX
>>
>> Fred, unless you have it around 120 feet high (half wavelength) it won't
>> show much directivity,
>> so it won't matter where it's pointed.
>> But if it is that high, it will be strongest broadside to the antenna,
>> and
>> weakest off the ends, like all dipoles.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> TowerTalk mailing list
>> TowerTalk@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|