Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Fwd: Fwd: Fwd: Maximum Guy Radius

To: <HansLG@aol.com>, <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Fwd: Fwd: Fwd: Maximum Guy Radius
From: "Gene Fuller" <w2lu@rochester.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 16:47:02 -0400
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
Hi Hans -

I've enjoyed seeing the results of your calculations. As a matter of 
curiosity, have you been taking into account column loading, or is that 
generally out of the picture? Certainly with an unguyed tower it would be 
less than with the same tower guyed. Then, if guyed, there is the tradeoff 
between guy weight and angle, and the vertical force component/column 
loading obtained from getting to the necesary guy tension/horizontal 
restraining force component.

Gene / W2LU

----- Original Message ----- 
From: <HansLG@aol.com>
To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Sent: Monday, October 10, 2011 3:03 PM
Subject: [TowerTalk] Fwd: Fwd: Fwd: Maximum Guy Radius


>
> Hi Bill,
>
> I just calculated the torque on the tower element and compared them with
> manufacturer recommended maximum torque. I found a small difference 
> between a
> stiff ground mounting and flexible ground mounting. I also tested
> different  locations of the guy wire attachment and selected the "best" 
> point.
> That's why  the guy wires are attached 16 feet from the top. I did not 
> make any
> calculations  of stress on the individual legs (which I probably should 
> have
> done to know for  sure everything is within limits) but reasoned that; as
> the tower is suppose to  be self-supporting it should be better with guy
> wires. As I have the guys  anchors at the 100% point I am not concerned 
> that
> things will go wrong. Better:  If it goes wrong it will be regardless what 
> I
> tried.
>
> You are right though, the stress on the tower legs is critical as it is
> what makes the tower stand.
>
> Hans - N2JFS
>
> In a message dated 10/7/2011 6:45:24 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
> baycock2@centurytel.net writes:
>
> Hans--
> I wondered, because I'd always  heard that Tower leg compressive stresses
> were a critical factor. Did you  monitor them?
> My tower has four guys, but mostly for access and stability  rather than
> stress. (It is a folding unit) It is interesting to follow the  tower leg
> forces and the Guy stress as the wind direction is rotated from the 
> "between
> leg" direction to the "In Line" direction for different numbers of 
> anchors.
> Bill--W4BSG
>
> On 10/6/2011 7:54 PM,  _HansLG@aol.com_ (mailto:HansLG@aol.com)  wrote:
>
>
> Hi Bill,
>
>
>
> With"stiffness" I mean how much the tower will move for a specific wind
>
> pressure. In my calculations I assumed that the tower moved 1" for a give
>
> wind.  Then I calculated how much the tower moved for the same wind force
> with
>
> different guy anchor point. I found that minimum move was for an anchor
>
> distance  of ~142%. (probably sqr(2)) under the assumption of no guy wire
> sag
>
> (which is  impossible).
>
>
>
> I was just "playing around" with a spread sheet and was interested to see
>
> where the optimum point was. 0% anchor point is no good for obvious reason
>
> but  an anchor point very far away is not good either as the guy wire is
>
> springy and  a too long wire will allow the tower to sway in the wind.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
> 

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>