You can always use "Dropbox" www.dropbox.com/
...No Affiliation...
73s de Jim
W5IFP
> -----Original Message-----
> From: towertalk-bounces@contesting.com
> [mailto:towertalk-bounces@contesting.com]On Behalf Of David Jordan
> Sent: Sunday, April 22, 2012 9:15 AM
> To: n4zr@contesting.com; towertalk@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Attachments was: Re: The Antenna System
>
>
> Think of it this way Pete -- why waste bandwidth sending
> graphics to the
> entire list and risk malware distribution when for a given
> topic perhaps
> less than 10% would have interest in a particular thread. Best
> to post the
> graphics to a web site where those interested can click on the link to
> gather more details and visuals. This is the way its done on
> other list
> services. Less risk, less bandwidth usage...
>
> 73,
> Dave
> wa3gin
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Pete Smith" <n4zr@comcast.net>
> To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
> Sent: Sunday, April 22, 2012 8:46 AM
> Subject: [TowerTalk] Attachments was: Re: The Antenna System
>
>
> > The blocking of attachments such as graphics with messages was
> > originally based on concern that they might be vehicles for
> viruses, as
> > well as the bandwidth implications of large attachments. The
> impact of
> > distributing a virus simultaneously to several thousand users was too
> > horrific to contemplate.
> >
> > I notice now that almost all attempts to distribute malware that I
> > receive are using links to trap the unwary. Whether or not
> it would be
> > safe to allow attachments is a question I leave to the
> security experts.
> >
> > 73, Pete N4ZR
> >
> > On 4/21/2012 11:45 PM, Bob K6UJ wrote:
> >> Jim,
> >>
> >> I concur 100%
> >> In the engineering fields we are accustomed to communicating with a
> >> description and a drawing showing the details.
> >> There should not be any guess work or trying to visualize the design.
> >>
> >> 73,
> >> Bob
> >> K6UJ
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Apr 21, 2012, at 8:11 PM, Jim Lux wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 4/21/12 8:12 AM, Ward Silver wrote:
> >>>> I'm really enjoying the multiple threads and discussions
> that started
> >>>> with baluns and have come around to an analysis of the
> entire antenna
> >>>> system.
> >>>>
> >>>> That changing just one element of the entire system in
> isolation is
> >>>> unrealistic is a key point that most hams do not
> appreciate - indeed,
> >>>> they rarely hear that point of view. They learn about
> antennas as one
> >>>> independent thing, feed lines are another thing, baluns a
> third thing,
> >>>> and so forth. Thus, they tend to analyze and troubleshoot
> and modify
> >>>> assuming changes "here" don't affect behavior "there".
> Since changing
> >>>> almost any part of the system affects the entire system,
> the results
> >>>> are wildly inconsistent and often mystifying - as noted by Ian and
> >>>> others. At any rate, the discussions have provided
> numerous examples
> >>>> to use in explaining antenna system behavior to our clubs
> and fellow
> >>>> hams (and in my case, readers) - thanks.
> >>>>
> >>>> Also, it would greatly facilitate the discussion were we
> to be able to
> >>>> include drawings - I noticed several misunderstandings
> that would not
> >>>> have occured if the text was accompanied by graphics. I
> can tell that
> >>>> many writing hours have been consumed trying to write
> clearly in a pure
> >>>> text environment!
> >>>>
> >>> picture, 1000 words, and all that..
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> TowerTalk mailing list
> >>> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> >>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
> >> _______________________________________________
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> TowerTalk mailing list
> >> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> >> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > TowerTalk mailing list
> > TowerTalk@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|