Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Tower and antenna decisions

To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Tower and antenna decisions
From: Richard Karlquist <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2013 21:05:26 -0700
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
On 2013-10-26 18:35, Richard Solomon wrote:

It may take some innovative fellow to come up with a SS Amp that behaves
better and my mention of LDMOS devices may be the way to go.

Some of the newer LDMOS devices are quite robust, and seem to be
oblivious of SWR (to a point).

73, Dick, W1KSZ


The recent activity in the LDMOS arena with various manufacturers
trying to outdo each other on maximum SWR specs is not relevant
to this discussion.  This is because these specs are merely
survival specs for the active device.  It doesn't mean that the
device can deliver useful power into a mismatch.

Unfortunately, there is no "innovative" circuit design or state of
the art device that will make a SS amp operate into a 2:1 SWR
efficiently.  If you want to deliver 1500W into any
load with better than a 2:1 SWR, you basically have to build an
amplifier that can deliver 3000W into 50 ohms, but only drive
it hard enough to get 1500W into 50 ohms.  It will also deliver
1500W into any 2:1 SWR, but the gain will be somewhat higher or
lower than for 50 ohms, depending on the angle of the load impedance.

The heat dissipation will basically double as well, and the power
supply will have to produce about 40% more current.  All that extra
heat will heat your shack, which is not good in the summer time.

After considering the above, an outboard tuner looks like a much
better option.  Or use antennas that are well matched in the first
place.

Rick N6RK

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>