Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] from towers to shack

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] from towers to shack
From: "Roger (K8RI) on TT" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2013 00:19:54 -0500
List-post: <[email protected]">mailto:[email protected]>
On 12/8/2013 9:37 PM, Steve Maki wrote:
On 12/8/2013 8:29 PM, Jim Lux wrote:

my question is about which is TECHNICALLY the best option, if there is a
technical benefit or about RFI to put them under ground. If there's no
advantage, is much easier to manage the cables OVER the ground

Mechanical protection is what's good about underground.
There's not a lot of practical difference from an RFI standpoint (either
can be good or bad..)


I always assumed that common mode currents should be at least slightly attenuated by the surrounding earth, but maybe not...

Although being in conduit reduces the capacitance to ground, on a several hundred foot run it's still substantial. I'm not sure about common mode, but it certainly reduces the pulse amplitude reaching the shack from a lightening strike, or nearby strike.

Direct burial cable would have considerably more capacitance to ground. I've never measured it, but "I'd think" it would be quite noticeable at reducing common mode to ground through HF. It seems intuitive, but that "I think" means I don't know for sure.

73

Roger (K8RI)


-Steve K8LX
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk


_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>